Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182548›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Identification of DNA-protein Binding Sites through Multi-Scale Local Average Blocks on Sequence Information.

Cong Shen, Yijie Ding, Jijun Tang, Jian Song, Fei Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Special Protein Molecules Computational Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cong ShenSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China. congshen@tju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-3320
Yijie DingSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China. wuxi_dyj@tju.edu.cn.
Jijun TangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China. fguo@tju.edu.cn.
Jian SongSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China. acthior@outlook.com.
Fei GuoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China. tangjijun@tju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-protein interactions appear as pivotal roles in diverse biological procedures and are paramount for cell metabolism, while identifying them with computational means is a kind of prudent scenario in depleting in vitro and in vivo experimental charging. A variety of state-of-the-art investigations have been elucidated to improve the accuracy of the DNA-protein binding sites prediction. Nevertheless, structure-based approaches are limited under the condition without 3D information, and the predictive validity is still refinable. In this essay, we address a kind of competitive method called Multi-scale Local Average Blocks (MLAB) algorithm to solve this issue. Different from structure-based routes, MLAB exploits a strategy that not only extracts local evolutionary information from primary sequences, but also using predicts solvent accessibility. Moreover, the construction about predictors of DNA-protein binding sites wields an ensemble weighted sparse representation model with random under-sampling. To evaluate the performance of MLAB, we conduct comprehensive experiments of DNA-protein binding sites prediction. MLAB gives M C C of 0.392 , 0.315 , 0.439 and 0.245 on PDNA-543, PDNA-41, PDNA-316 and PDNA-52 datasets, respectively. It shows that MLAB gains advantages by comparing with other outstanding methods. M C C for our method is increased by at least 0.053 , 0.015 and 0.064 on PDNA-543, PDNA-41 and PDNA-316 datasets, respectively.

Indexed as

Binding SitesAlgorithmsBase SequenceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsModels, MolecularModels, TheoreticalMolecular ConformationPosition-Specific Scoring MatricesROC CurveDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA–protein binding sitesensemble classifierfeature extractionrandom sub-samplingsparse representation model

Identifiers

PMID29182548
PMCPMC6149935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.