Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182384›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Efficacy of a rectal spacer with prostate SABR-first UK experience.

Raymond B King, Sarah Os Osman, Ciaran Fairmichael, Denise M Irvine, Ciara A Lyons, Ananth Ravi, Joe M O'Sullivan, Alan R Hounsell, Darren M Mitchell, Conor K McGarry and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Role of rectal spacers in gynecological cancer radiotherapy: reducing rectal dose and treatment-related toxicity.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The role of radioprotective spacers in clinical practice: a review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Raymond B King1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Sarah Os Osman1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Ciaran Fairmichael1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Denise M Irvine2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland.
Ciara A Lyons1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Ananth Ravi5 Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre , Toronto , Canada.
Joe M O'Sullivan1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Alan R Hounsell1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Darren M Mitchell3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland.
Conor K McGarry1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.
Suneil Jain1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assessed the use of implanted hydrogel rectal spacers for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-volumetric modulated arc therapy (SABR-VMAT) patients, investigating practicality, dosimetric impact, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and early toxicity.

methodsData from the first 6 patients treated within a prostate SABR and rectal spacer trial were examined to determine spacer insertion tolerability, resultant changes in treatment planning and dosimetry and early toxicity effects. CT scans acquired prior to spacer insertion were used to generate SABR plans which were compared to post-insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, conformity, and organs at risk doses with NTCPs also determined from resultant dose fluences. Early toxicity data were also collected.

resultsAll patients had successful spacer insertion under local anaesthetic with maximal Grade 1 toxicity. All plans were highly conformal, with no significant differences in clinical target volume dose coverage between pre- and post-spacer plans. Substantial improvements in rectal dose metrics were observed in post-spacer plans, e.g. rectal volume receiving 36 Gy reduced by ≥42% for all patients. Median NTCP for Grade 2 + rectal bleeding significantly decreased from 4.9 to 0.8% with the use of a rectal spacer (p = 0.031). To date, two episodes of acute Grade 1 proctitis have been reported following treatment.

conclusionThe spacer resulted in clinically and statistically significant reduction in rectal doses for all patients. Advances in knowledge: This is one of the first studies to investigate the efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in prostate SABR treatments. Observed dose sparing of the rectum is predicted to result in meaningful clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBiopsyFiducial MarkersHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsProstatic NeoplasmsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID29182384
PMCPMC5965462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.