Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29182146›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation.

Michael B Winter, Florencia La Greca, Shirin Arastu-Kapur, Francesco Caiazza, Peter Cimermancic, Tonia J Buchholz, Janet L Anderl, Matthew Ravalin, Markus F Bohn, Andrej Sali and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Enhancing schistosomiasis drug discovery approaches with optimized proteasome substrates.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael B WinterDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4824-8024
Florencia La GrecaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Shirin Arastu-KapurDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Francesco CaiazzaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-1130
Peter CimermancicDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Tonia J BuchholzOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen subsidiary, San Francisco, United States.
Janet L AnderlOnyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen subsidiary, San Francisco, United States.
Matthew RavalinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Markus F BohnDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Andrej SaliDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-6197
Anthony J O'DonoghueSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5695-0409
Charles S CraikDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7704-9185
University of California, San Francisco · USAmgen (United States) · USQB3 · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms in CancerT32CA108462 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GOGA, ANDREI · 2004 to 2024
$10.4M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL BIOLOGYT32GM064337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIK, CHARLES SCOTT · 2002 to 2021
$7.8M
Bio-Organic Biomedical Mass Spectromy ResourceP41GM103481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BURLINGAME, ALMA L · 2012 to 2015
$6.4M
Renewable antibodies to secreted proteins and single and multi-pass cell surfaceP41CA196276 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MARKS, JAMES D. · 2014 to 2018
$5.8M
High Performance Computer for Computational BiosciencesS10OD021596 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2016 to 2016
$443k
Exploring the proteasome as a new drug target to treat schistosomiasisR21AI133393 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI O'DONOGHUE, ANTHONY JOHN · 2017 to 2018
$426k
Extracellular Proteolysis as a Molecular Stratification Tool for CancerR21CA186077 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIK, CHARLES SCOTT · 2014 to 2015
$370k
Profiling the Role of Protease Activity in Cancer ProgressionF32CA168150 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WINTER, MICHAEL B. · 2012 to 2014
$136k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA168150NCI NIH HHS P41 CA196276NCI NIH HHS R21 CA186077NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108462NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI133393NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103481NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM064337NIH HHS S10 OD021596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunoproteasome (iP) has been proposed to perform specialized roles in MHC class I antigen presentation, cytokine modulation, and T cell differentiation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune disorders and cancer. However, divergence in function between the iP and the constitutive proteasome (cP) has been unclear. A global peptide library-based screening strategy revealed that the proteasomes have overlapping but distinct substrate specificities. Differing iP specificity alters the quantity of production of certain MHC I epitopes but does not appear to be preferentially suited for antigen presentation. Furthermore, iP specificity was found to have likely arisen through genetic drift from the ancestral cP. Specificity differences were exploited to develop isoform-selective substrates. Cellular profiling using these substrates revealed that divergence in regulation of the iP balances its relative contribution to proteasome capacity in immune cells, resulting in selective recovery from inhibition. These findings have implications for iP-targeted therapeutic development.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunologic FactorsMass SpectrometryProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSubstrate SpecificityImmunologic FactorsProteasome Endopeptidase Complexantigen presentationbiochemistryimmunoproteasomenoneproteasomeproteostasis

Identifiers

PMID29182146
PMCPMC5705213
OpenAlexW2769780075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.