Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181802›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018

Study and Understanding Behavior of Alginate-Inulin Synbiotics Beads for Protection and Delivery of Antimicrobial-Producing Probiotics in Colonic Simulated Conditions.

Abdelbasset Atia, Ahmed Gomaa, Benoit Fernandez, Muriel Subirade, Ismail Fliss

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dual-Targeting Mn@CeOACS nano · 2025
    Article
  2. AmSphere · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Inulin and Its Application in Drug Delivery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdelbasset AtiaDepartment of Food Science, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Ahmed GomaaDepartment of Food Science, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Benoit FernandezDepartment of Food Science, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Muriel SubiradeDepartment of Food Science, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Ismail FlissDepartment of Food Science, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada. Ismail.Fliss@fsaa.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CANational Research Centre · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), using antibiotics as growth promoters for livestock-particularly swine-is the principal cause of antibiotic resistance. It is therefore clear that finding an alternative to antibiotics becomes an emergency. Hundreds of recent studies have appointed probiotics as potential candidates to replace or to be used in combination with antibiotics. However, bringing probiotics alive to the colon-their site of action-remains a big challenge because of different physiological barriers encountered in proximal gastrointestinal tract (GIT) such as acidic pH and bile salts that may affect the viability of probiotic cultures. To overcome this problem, in previous studies, we developed and characterize a synbiotic formula consisting of beads of a mixture of alginate and inulin. Three potential probiotics strains namely Pediococcus acidilactici UL5 (UL5), Lactobacillus reuteri (LR), and Lactobacillus salivarius (LS) were encapsulated to study their release and the behavior of this synbiotic formula throughout the GIT using in vitro models. The survival and the release of bacteria from beads were studied by specific PMA-qPCR counting. The microscopic aspects of the beads were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Moreover, the microbial dynamics inside beads were studied by fluorescence microscopy using the live/dead test. Our results have shown that the beads containing 5% inulin were the most stable in the stomach and throughout the small intestine. However, beads were completely degraded in approximately 3 h of incubation in the fermented medium that mimic the colon. These results were confirmed by SEM and fluorescence microscopy images. Therefore, it can be stated that the AI5 formulation well protected the bacteria in the upper part of the digestive tract and allowed their controlled release in the colon.

Indexed as

AlginatesAnimalsColonDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsGastrointestinal TractInulinLimosilactobacillus reuteriMicrobial ViabilityPediococcus acidilacticiPrebioticsProbioticsSwineSynbioticsAlginatesInulinPrebioticsColonic behaviorColonic deliveryInulin-alginate beadsprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID29181802
OpenAlexW2768577770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.