Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181613›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2018

SimpleITK Image-Analysis Notebooks: a Collaborative Environment for Education and Reproducible Research.

Ziv Yaniv, Bradley C Lowekamp, Hans J Johnson, Richard Beare

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 221 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GPR15-guided CD8Nature · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TCIA Radiology Image Processing for AI and Radiomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ziv YanivTAJ Technologies Inc., Bloomington, MN, 55425, USA. zivyaniv@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0315-7727
Bradley C LowekampNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
Hans J JohnsonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Richard BeareDepartment of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern scientific endeavors increasingly require team collaborations to construct and interpret complex computational workflows. This work describes an image-analysis environment that supports the use of computational tools that facilitate reproducible research and support scientists with varying levels of software development skills. The Jupyter notebook web application is the basis of an environment that enables flexible, well-documented, and reproducible workflows via literate programming. Image-analysis software development is made accessible to scientists with varying levels of programming experience via the use of the SimpleITK toolkit, a simplified interface to the Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit. Additional features of the development environment include user friendly data sharing using online data repositories and a testing framework that facilitates code maintenance. SimpleITK provides a large number of examples illustrating educational and research-oriented image analysis workflows for free download from GitHub under an Apache 2.0 license: github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/SimpleITK-Notebooks .

Indexed as

ResearchCooperative BehaviorDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiologyReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowImage analysisOpen-source softwarePythonRRegistrationSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID29181613
PMCPMC5959828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.