Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181449›Full record

ArticlemSystems

Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals Novel Candidate Genes for

Evelyne Mann, Corinne M Stouthamer, Suzanne E Kelly, Monika Dzieciol, Martha S Hunter, Stephan Schmitz-Esser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Male-dependent resistance toRoyal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A novelmSphere · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The facultative intracellular symbiontFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PNAS nexus · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex-basedGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Evelyne MannInstitute for Milk Hygiene, Milk Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Corinne M StouthamerDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Suzanne E KellyDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Monika DzieciolInstitute for Milk Hygiene, Milk Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Martha S HunterDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Stephan Schmitz-EsserInstitute for Milk Hygiene, Milk Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1907-0709
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is an intriguing, widespread, symbiont-induced reproductive failure that decreases offspring production of arthropods through crossing incompatibility of infected males with uninfected females or with females infected with a distinct symbiont genotype. For years, the molecular mechanism of CI remained unknown. Recent genomic, proteomic, biochemical, and cell biological studies have contributed to understanding of CI in the alphaproteobacterium

Indexed as

BacteroidetesCardiniumcytoplasmic incompatibilityendosymbiontsgene expressionhost-microbe interactionRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29181449
PMCPMC5698495
OpenAlexW2768205295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.