Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181425›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2016

Label-free photoacoustic tomography of whole mouse brain structures

Lei Li, Jun Xia, Guo Li, Alejandro Garcia-Uribe, Qiwei Sheng, Mark A Anastasio, Lihong V Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Revealing the MRI-Contrast in Optically Cleared Brains.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multiscale Photoacoustic Tomography of a Genetically Encoded Near-Infrared FRET Biosensor.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei LiWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Electrical and System Engineering, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Jun XiaUniversity at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 332 Bonner Hall, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States.
Guo LiWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Alejandro Garcia-UribeWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Qiwei ShengWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Mark A AnastasioWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Lihong V WangWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Electrical and System Engineering, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

PHOTON TUNNELING: SHEDDING NEW LIGHT ON BIOMEDICINEDP1EB016986 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2012 to 2016
$3.8M
IN VIVO IMAGING OF SINGLE CIRCULATING CELLSR01CA186567 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
FAST HIGH-RESOLUTION DEEP PHOTOACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY OF ACTION POTENTIALS IN BRAINSU01NS090579 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2014 to 2016
$2.7M
WHOLE-BODY SMALL-ANIMAL PHOTOACOUSTIC-ULTRASONIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHYR01EB016963 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANASTASIO, MARK A · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186567NIBIB NIH HHS DP1 EB016986NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016963NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capitalizing on endogenous hemoglobin contrast, photoacoustic-computed tomography (PACT), a deep-tissue high-resolution imaging modality, has drawn increasing interest in neuroimaging. However, most existing studies are limited to functional imaging on the cortical surface and the deep brain structural imaging capability of PACT has never been demonstrated. Here, we explicitly studied the limiting factors of deep brain PACT imaging. We found that the skull distorted the acoustic signal and blood suppressed the structural contrast from other chromophores. When the two effects are mitigated, PACT can potentially provide high-resolution label-free imaging of structures in the entire mouse brain. With [Formula: see text] in-plane resolution, we can clearly identify major structures of the brain, which complements magnetic resonance microscopy for imaging small-animal brain structures. Spectral PACT studies indicate that structural contrasts mainly originate from cytochrome distribution and that the presence of lipid sharpens the image contrast; brain histology results provide further validation. The feasibility of imaging the structure of the brain

Indexed as

brain structural imagingdeep brain imaginglabel freephotoacoustic-computed tomographyspectral imaging

Identifiers

PMID29181425
PMCPMC5696384
OpenAlexW2478901006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.