ArticleJournal of the West African College of Surgeons
ANAESTHETISTS' ATTITUDES AND PRACTICE OF INFORMED CONSENT IN NIGERIA.
Article in Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical informed consent practices and influencing factors in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of the literature.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformed consent is an integral part of a surgical and anaesthetic procedure, failure to obtain it may result in grave medico-legal implications.
aimTo determine the attitudes of Nigerian anaesthetists to informed consent. METHODOLOGY: The study population included physician anaesthetists who attended a continuous medical education programme in November 2015. The target was to cover over 50% of anaesthetists by convenience sampling. The responses to the questions were recorded and descriptive statistics were employed to calculate the various qualitative variables under study.
resultsFifty-six respondents were analysed, the majority were in the age group 31-40 years (37.5%), consultants were 51.79%, and males constituted 75%. The respondents agreed that the main purposes of informed consent included a need to improve the doctor/patient relationship in 36(64.29%), inform the patient about the desired benefits of the procedure in 32(57.14%), provide the doctor with greater protection against medical litigation in 32(57.14%), and to respect the patient's right of autonomy in 30(53.57%). The general consensus among the respondents was that the anaesthetist should explain to the patient what the procedure entails 40(71.43%), what the procedure aims to achieve and additional procedures that are likely to be necessary to the patient 41(73.21%). It was also agreed that there should be disclosure of all major risks/complications with incidence >1/20 in 29(51.79%) respondents, incidence >1/100 in 20(35.71%), incidence >1/1000, and incidence >1/10000 were 17(30.36%). The respondents who agreed that it is necessary to take consent before performing surgery or anaesthesia on patients and explained the procedure to patients were 48(85.71%).
conclusionWe determined that informed consent was an integral part of a surgical procedure. which helped to improve doctor/patient relationship, respected the patient's right of autonomy and provided the surgeon and anaesthetists with greater protection against medical litigation. It is paramount to disclose all major risk and complications. However, few anaesthetists 19(33.93%) obtain informed consent from their patients before epidural labour analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29181366PMC5667723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.