ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2017
A new interpretation and quantitative method for diplopia test: 304 cases of ocular motor nerve palsy for clinical test and verify.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlations between the clinical characteristics of diabetic trochlear nerve palsy and diplopia severity.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Automatic diagnosis of extraocular muscle palsy based on machine learning and diplopia images.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Investigation of the differential susceptibility of extraocular muscles in patients diagnosed with ocular myasthenia gravis based on the computerized diplopia test and the Ocular Motor Nerve Palsy Scale.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Eye movement training and gaze analysis for a patient with binocular diplopia after traumatic brain injury: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of the Ocular Motor Nerve Palsy Scale.Neural regeneration research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a new interpretation and quantitative method for computerized diplopia test. By comparing this new method to the Hess screen test, we validate its applicability among 304 patients with ocular motor nerve palsy. This new method shows great assistant value as the Hess screen test in making accurate diagnosis and quantitative evaluation the severity of diplopia. Furthermore, it is more convenient and suitable for daily clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.