Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181320›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2017

Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and Meta-analysis.

Min Sun, Zhi-Qiang Zhang, Chi-Yuan Ma, Sui-Hua Chen, Xin-Jian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Consensus for Pituitary Adenoma Diagnosis in Indonesia.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min SunSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhi-Qiang ZhangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chi-Yuan MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China.
Sui-Hua ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xin-Jian ChenSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the dominant predictive factors of postoperative visual recovery for patients with pituitary adenoma.

methodsPubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant human studies, which investigated the prediction of the postoperative visual recovery of patients with pituitary adenoma, from January 2000 to May 2017. Meta-analyses were performed on the primary outcomes. After the related data were extracted by two independent investigators, pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects or a fixed-effects model.

resultsNineteen studies were included in the literature review, and nine trials were included in the Meta-analysis, which comprised 530 patients (975 eyes) with pituitary adenoma. For the primary outcomes, there was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative mean deviation (MD) values of the visual field (WMD -5.85; 95%CI: -8.19 to -3.51;

conclusionPreoperative visual field defect, symptom duration, patient age, and preoperative pRNFL thickness are the dominant predictive factors of the postoperative recovery of the visual field for patients with pituitary adenoma.

Indexed as

pituitary adenomaretinal thicknessvisual field defectvisual function recovery prediction

Identifiers

PMID29181320
PMCPMC5686375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.