ArticlePeerJ2017
Do rotational shear-cushioning shoes influence horizontal ground reaction forces and perceived comfort during basketball cutting maneuvers?
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Orthotic Insoles on Gait Biomechanics in Runners With Flatfoot Under Different Gait Loads.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- Biomechanical insights into carbon plate geometry in running shoes in male runners: implications for sprint performance and ankle stability.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Effect of toe box size on basketball-specific movement performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Footwear comfort: a systematic search and narrative synthesis of the literature.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2021Review
- Change of Direction Speed Tests in Basketball Players: A Brief Review of Test Varieties and Recent Trends.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Review
- The Influence of Forefoot Bending Stiffness of Futsal Shoes on Multiple V-Cut Run Performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Ground Reaction Forces and Temporal Characteristics Define Cutting Performance.International journal of exercise science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCourt shoe designs predominantly focus on reducing excessive vertical ground reaction force, but shear force cushioning has received little attention in the basketball population. We aimed to examine the effect of a novel shoe-cushioning design on both resultant horizontal ground reaction forces and comfort perception during two basketball-specific cutting movements.
methodsFifteen university team basketball players performed lateral shuffling and 45-degree sidestep cutting at maximum effort in basketball shoes with and without the shear-cushioning system (SCS). Paired
resultsSCS shoe allowed for larger rotational material deformation compared with control shoes, but no significant shoe differences were found in braking phase kinetics during both cutting movements ( DISCUSSION: The application of a rotational shear-cushioning structure allowed for better forefoot comfort and enhanced propulsion performance in cutting, but did not influence the shear impact. Understanding horizontal ground reaction force information may be useful in designing footwear to prevent shear-related injuries in sport populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.