Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181139›Full record

ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2017

Outcome of Frontline Treatment with "Generic" Imatinib In Adult Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Algerian Population: A Multicenter Study.

B Entasoltan, M A Bekadja, H Touhami, N Mehalhal, Z Zouaoui, N Mesli, M Talbi, A Bachiri, M Michallet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B EntasoltanService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, EHU1 Novembre, Oran, Algérie.
M A BekadjaService d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, EHU1 Novembre, Oran, Algérie.
H TouhamiService d'Hématologie, CHU Oran, Algérie.
N MehalhalService d'Hématologie, EPH Mascara, Algérie.
Z ZouaouiService d'Hématologie, CHU Sidi-Bel-Abbès, Algérie.
N MesliService d'Hématologie, CHU Tlemcen, Algérie.
M TalbiService d'Hématologie, CHU Béchar, Algérie.
A BachiriService d'Hématologie, HMRU Oran, Algérie.
M MichalletService d'Hématologie, CHU Lyon, France.
Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn a developing country like Algeria, such expensive therapy is not available. Alternative approaches are needed to help these adult. In Algeria 'imatib' (CIPLA-India) was introduced in 2006; but no study has been published yet in the North Africa region regarding response and outcome of this copy in CML patients. The goal of this multicenter study is to characterize newly adult CML in the western region of Algeria and to assess the effectiveness and safety of imatib (IM, copy) as frontline therapy for patients with CML. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study was carried out in 7 hematology centers in the western Algeria. Patients, who were diagnosed to be suffering from CML between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st, 2014 were selected for data analysis. All patients received a copy preparation, consisting of the alpha crystal form of imatinib, (IM, copy) at an oral dose of 400 mg daily and monitored for tolerance and side effects while on therapy.

resultsBetween January 2007 and December 2014, 355 patients with CML were treated with imatib (Copy). The median follow- up of the study was 46 months (range: 13-107 months). Complete hematological response (CHR) was seen in 83% of patients within 3 months. According to the Sokal score, 72% patients with low, 78% with intermediate and 69% with high risk disease achieved a CHR in 3 months (p=0.26) and according to the EUTOS score, 81% of patients with low and 70% with high risk disease achieved a CHR in 3 months (p=0.08). The major molecular response (MMR) at six months (M6), M9, M12, M18 and M24 was 21%, 38%, 35%, 51% and 67% respectively and 34% of patients achieved a complete molecular response (CMR). The projected 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83%. Side effects of imatib (copy) in this study were similar to those reported previously for the entire imatinib mesylate treatment study and only 8% of patients were intolerant to imatib (copy) and treated with a second generation of BCR-ABL inhibitor.

conclusionThis study reflects real world experience treating patients with CML in a developing country and thus sheds light on differences in this population compared to Western countries. In conclusion, imatib (copy) is effective and safe in treating patients with CML in chronic phase and proves to have a durable outcome. To our knowledge this is the first study reporting the response to imatib (copy) in an Algerian population.

Indexed as

Chronic MyeloidGeneric ImatibImatinibLeukemia

Identifiers

PMID29181139
PMCPMC5667527
OpenAlexW2766904367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.