Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29181078›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2017

Pain, acceptance of illness, adjustment to life with cancer and coping strategies in prostate cancer patients.

Aleksandra I Czerw, Urszula Religioni, Andrzej Deptała, Adam Fronczak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Acceptance in Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Social Network Analysis Approach to COVID-19 Community Detection Techniques.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Beliefs about Pain Control in Patients after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery-A Preliminary Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra I CzerwDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Urszula ReligioniDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej DeptałaDepartment of Cancer Prevention, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Adam FronczakDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLCentral Clinical Hospital · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer is the second most common type of carcinoma in men. The rate of prostate cancer has increased approximately fivefold lover the last 30 years. The purpose of the study was to evaluate coping strategies, pain management, illness acceptance, and adjustment to cancer in patients diagnosed with prostate carcinoma and the effect of socioeconomic variables on the above-mentioned issues. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study included 228 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. The questionnaire interview consisted of demographic questions and four psychometric tests: BPCQ, measuring the influence of factors affecting pain management, CSQ, designed to evaluate pain coping strategies, the AIS questionnaire, measuring disease acceptance, and the Mini-Mac.

resultsPain locus of control scores in prostate cancer patients are distributed evenly across all three BPCQ subscales. The top mean score was observed in the area of beliefs that powerful others (doctors) control pain. Increased behavioral activity was the most frequently selected coping strategy (mean score = 18.27). The average level of disease acceptance in study patients was 30.39, with a standard deviation of 8.07. The results were differentiated by education (

conclusionsThe main belief about pain control in prostate cancer patients is that powerful others (doctors) control pain. The study patients cope with disease constructively. The main socioeconomic variables which differentiate the scores obtained across all tests are income and education.

Indexed as

acceptance of illnessAISBPCQCSQmini-MACprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID29181078
PMCPMC5701675
OpenAlexW2321730114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.