ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2017
Value of
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and validation of blood leukocyte DNA methylation biomarkers for early detection of colorectal neoplasm.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Unsupervised cell line embedding using pairwise drug response correlation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Macrophage polarization-related gene signature for risk stratification and prognosis of survival in gliomas.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Diagnostic value of fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of TIMM50 expression in colorectal cancer.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023Article
- Deep learning survival model for colorectal cancer patients (DeepCRC) with Asian clinical data compared with different theories.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023Article
- The Microbiome and Gut Endocannabinoid System in the Regulation of Stress Responses and Metabolism.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Promising Epigenetic Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Cannabinoids and Endocannabinoid System Changes in Intestinal Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Panoramic colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening - a randomized controlled trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Article
- Cannabinoid Receptor Interacting Protein 1a (CRIP1a) in Health and Disease.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- A rare genomic duplication in 2p14 underlies autosomal dominant hearing loss DFNA58.Human molecular genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Whole-blood DNA Methylation Markers for Risk Stratification in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2019Review
- How to improve the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening? Clinical factors and technological advancements.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the study was to investigate the effect of MATERIAL AND
methodsQuantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) was used to detect the methylation status of the
resultsThere were differences in the methylation status at loci 2216, 2226, 2231, 2245, and 2254 within the promoter region of
conclusionsThe methylation status at locus 2245 within the CNRIP1 promoter region has potential value for the early detection and prognostic evaluation of colorectal cancers. Demethylation of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.