Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180930›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2017

Examination of anastomotic leak with aqueous contrast swallow after total gastrectomy: Should it be carried out routinely?

Ulaş Aday, Ebubekir Gündeş, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe, Durmuş A Çetin, Selçuk Gülmez, Aziz S Senger, Kamuran C Değer, Mustafa Duman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Should Pyloric Lymph Nodes Be Dissected for Siewert Type II and III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junctions: Experience from a High-Volume Center in China.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ulaş AdayDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Ebubekir GündeşDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Hüseyin ÇiyiltepeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Durmuş A ÇetinDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Selçuk GülmezDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Aziz S SengerDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Kamuran C DeğerDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.
Mustafa DumanDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu High Speciality Education and Training Hospital, İstanbul,Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyExamination of esophagojejunal (EJ) anastomosis with aqueous contrast swallow after total gastrectomy is still routinely conducted by many centres. The present study aimed to answer the question: Is it necessary to evaluate EJ anastomosis in terms of leakage by having every patient drink oral contrast agent before initiation of oral food intake after total gastrectomy (TG) performed due to gastric cancer? MATERIAL AND

methodsClinical and radiological results of patients on whom total gastrectomy was performed due to gastric cancer between January 2013 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic method used for patients in whom leak developed and therapeutic interventions were assessed. Evaluation results from aqueous contrast agent and clinical, laboratory, and tomographic findings were studied.

resultsSixty of the 69 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with a diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma swallowed aqueous contrast agent on postoperative day 7 ±2 days and were evaluated in terms of anastomotic leak. Leak developed in 14 patients (20.2 %), 10 of whom ingested contrast agent. Leak was identified in 6 of those patients; however, diagnosis was made with multislice computed tomography (CT) in four patients (40%). The sensitivity of the examination with aqueous contrast agent was 60%.

conclusionsEvaluating anastomotic leak with aqueous contrast agent after TG has low sensitivity, and it would be wise to resort to this procedure in cases with clinical suspicion, rather than routinely performing it in every patient.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakdiagnostic imagingesophagojejunal anastomosisgastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID29180930
PMCPMC5701583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.