Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180894›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2017

Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time-frequency-channel domain.

Lisa Goudman, Jorne Laton, Raf Brouns, Guy Nagels, Eva Huysmans, Ronald Buyl, Kelly Ickmans, Jo Nijs, Maarten Moens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa GoudmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel.
Jorne LatonCenter for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB).
Raf BrounsCenter for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB).
Guy NagelsCenter for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB).
Eva HuysmansPain in Motion International Research Group.
Ronald BuylDepartment of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Kelly IckmansPain in Motion International Research Group.
Jo NijsPain in Motion International Research Group.
Maarten MoensDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEPhysiotherapy New Zealand · NZNational Multiple Sclerosis Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to capture the electroencephalographic signature of experimentally induced pain and pain-modulating mechanisms after painful peripheral electrical stimulation to determine one or a selected group of electrodes at a specific time point with a specific frequency range. In the first experiment, ten healthy participants were exposed to stimulation of the right median nerve while registering brain activity using 32-channel electroencephalography. Electrical stimulations were organized in four blocks of 20 stimuli with four intensities - 100%, 120%, 140%, and 160% - of the electrical pain threshold. In the second experiment, 15 healthy participants received electrical stimulation on the dominant median nerve before and during the application of a second painful stimulus. Raw data were converted into the time-frequency domain by applying a continuous wavelet transform. Separated domain information was extracted by calculating Parafac models. The results demonstrated that it is possible to capture a reproducible cortical neural response after painful electrical stimulation, more specifically at 250 milliseconds poststimulus, at the midline electrodes Cz and FCz with predominant δ-oscillations. The signature of the top-down nociceptive inhibitory mechanisms is δ-activity at 235 ms poststimulus at the prefrontal electrodes. This study presents a methodology to overcome the a priori determination of the regions of interest to analyze the brain response after painful electrical stimulation.

Indexed as

conditioned pain modulationelectroencephalographypainful electrical stimulationParafac model

Identifiers

PMID29180894
PMCPMC5697445
OpenAlexW2770058499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.