Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Electronic Health Record Driven Prediction for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy.

Hang Qiu, Hai-Yan Yu, Li-Ya Wang, Qiang Yao, Si-Nan Wu, Can Yin, Bo Fu, Xiao-Juan Zhu, Yan-Long Zhang, Yong Xing and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Digital Health Data Quality Issues: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hang QiuBig Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Hai-Yan YuBig Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China. yhy188@gmail.com.
Li-Ya WangBig Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Qiang YaoDivision of Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Si-Nan WuDivision of Information Management, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Can YinChengdu Shulianyikang Technology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Bo FuBig Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Xiao-Juan ZhuBig Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Yan-Long ZhangChengdu Shulianyikang Technology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yong XingChengdu Shulianyikang Technology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jun DengChengdu Shulianyikang Technology Co., Ltd, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Hao YangSchool of Computer Science, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, 610225, Sichuan, China.
Shun-Dong LeiDivision of Information Management, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. tomlsd@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is conventionally confirmed with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in 24 to 28 weeks of gestation, but it is still uncertain whether it can be predicted with secondary use of electronic health records (EHRs) in early pregnancy. To this purpose, the cost-sensitive hybrid model (CSHM) and five conventional machine learning methods are used to construct the predictive models, capturing the future risks of GDM in the temporally aggregated EHRs. The experimental data sources from a nested case-control study cohort, containing 33,935 gestational women in West China Second Hospital. After data cleaning, 4,378 cases and 50 attributes are stored and collected for the data set. Through selecting the most feasible method, the cost parameter of CSHM is adapted to deal with imbalance of the dataset. In the experiment, 3940 samples are used for training and the rest 438 samples for testing. Although the accuracy of positive samples is barely acceptable (62.16%), the results suggest that the vast majority (98.4%) of those predicted positive instances are real positives. To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply machine learning models with EHRs to predict GDM, which will facilitate personalized medicine in maternal health management in the future.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAdultAlgorithmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGestational AgeHumansModels, StatisticalPregnancyPrognosisROC CurveWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID29180800
PMCPMC5703904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.