Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180695›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria synergistically enhance host plant defences against pathogens.

Alejandro Pérez-de-Luque, Stefanie Tille, Irene Johnson, David Pascual-Pardo, Jurriaan Ton, Duncan D Cameron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Interactive effects between the invasive weedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandro Pérez-de-LuqueDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, Plant Production and Protection (P3) Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. alejandro.perez.luque@juntadeandalucia.es.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-0354
Stefanie TilleDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, Plant Production and Protection (P3) Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Irene JohnsonDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, Plant Production and Protection (P3) Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
David Pascual-PardoDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, Plant Production and Protection (P3) Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
Jurriaan TonDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, Plant Production and Protection (P3) Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-2802
Duncan D CameronDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, Plant Production and Protection (P3) Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. d.cameron@sheffield.ac.uk.
University of Sheffield · GBAndalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L027925/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Belowground interactions between plant roots, mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can improve plant health via enhanced nutrient acquisition and priming of the plant immune system. Two wheat cultivars differing in their ability to form mycorrhiza were (co)inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and the rhizobacterial strain Pseudomonas putida KT2440. The cultivar with high mycorrhizal compatibility supported higher levels of rhizobacterial colonization than the low compatibility cultivar. Those levels were augmented by mycorrhizal infection. Conversely, rhizobacterial colonization of the low compatibility cultivar was reduced by mycorrhizal arbuscule formation. Single inoculations with R. irregularis or P. putida had differential growth effects on both cultivars. Furthermore, while both cultivars developed systemic priming of chitosan-induced callose after single inoculations with R. irregularis or P. putida, only the cultivar with high mycorrhizal compatibility showed a synergistic increase in callose responsiveness following co-inoculation with both microbes. Our results show that multilateral interactions between roots, mycorrhizal fungi and PGPR can have synergistic effects on growth and systemic priming of wheat.

Indexed as

Disease ResistancePlant DevelopmentSymbiosisAnalysis of VarianceHost-Pathogen InteractionsMycorrhizaePlant RootsRhizobiaceae

Identifiers

PMID29180695
PMCPMC5703727
OpenAlexW2769758454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.