ArticleScientific reports2017
Prediction of postoperative outcomes using intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of Perioperative Music on Medication Requirement and Hospital Length of Stay: A Meta-analysis.Annals of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Application of modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting outcomes following adult living donor liver transplantation.World journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
- Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Stress Response Using Nociception Monitor under General Anesthesia and Postoperative Complications: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Prediction and Prevention of Intraoperative Hypotension with the Hypotension Prediction Index: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Scoring the capillary leak syndrome: towards an individualized gradation of the vascular barrier injury.Annals of intensive care · 2022Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major surgeries can result in high rates of adverse postoperative events. Reliable prediction of which patient might be at risk for such events may help guide peri- and postoperative care. We show how archiving and mining of intraoperative hemodynamic data in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can aid in the prediction of postoperative 180-day mortality and acute renal failure (ARF), improving upon predictions that rely on preoperative information only. From 101 patient records, we extracted 15 preoperative features from clinical records and 41 features from intraoperative hemodynamic signals. We used logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation to predict outcomes, and incorporated methods to limit potential model instabilities from feature multicollinearity. Using only preoperative features, mortality prediction achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.44-0.78). By using intraoperative features, performance improved significantly to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.56-0.91, P = 0.001). Similarly, including intraoperative features (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94) in ARF prediction improved performance over preoperative features (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85), though not significantly (P = 0.32). We conclude that inclusion of intraoperative hemodynamic features significantly improves prediction of postoperative events in OLT. Features strongly associated with occurrence of both outcomes included greater intraoperative central venous pressure and greater transfusion volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.