Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180647›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Prediction of postoperative outcomes using intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data.

Varesh Prasad, Maria Guerrisi, Mario Dauri, Filadelfo Coniglione, Giuseppe Tisone, Elisa De Carolis, Annagrazia Cillis, Antonio Canichella, Nicola Toschi, Thomas Heldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Varesh PrasadHarvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. varesh@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-5205
Maria GuerrisiMedical Physics Section, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Mario DauriDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Filadelfo ConiglioneDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe TisoneDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Elisa De CarolisDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, University Hospital "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Annagrazia CillisDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anaesthesiology, University Hospital "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Antonio CanichellaMedical Physics Section, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Nicola ToschiMedical Physics Section, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Thomas HeldtInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-1499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major surgeries can result in high rates of adverse postoperative events. Reliable prediction of which patient might be at risk for such events may help guide peri- and postoperative care. We show how archiving and mining of intraoperative hemodynamic data in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can aid in the prediction of postoperative 180-day mortality and acute renal failure (ARF), improving upon predictions that rely on preoperative information only. From 101 patient records, we extracted 15 preoperative features from clinical records and 41 features from intraoperative hemodynamic signals. We used logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation to predict outcomes, and incorporated methods to limit potential model instabilities from feature multicollinearity. Using only preoperative features, mortality prediction achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.44-0.78). By using intraoperative features, performance improved significantly to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.56-0.91, P = 0.001). Similarly, including intraoperative features (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94) in ARF prediction improved performance over preoperative features (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85), though not significantly (P = 0.32). We conclude that inclusion of intraoperative hemodynamic features significantly improves prediction of postoperative events in OLT. Features strongly associated with occurrence of both outcomes included greater intraoperative central venous pressure and greater transfusion volumes.

Indexed as

Hemodynamic MonitoringHemodynamicsMonitoring, IntraoperativeArea Under CurveHumansMortalityOdds RatioPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29180647
PMCPMC5703992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.