Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180472›Full record

ArticleCancer research2018

Utility of Single-Cell Genomics in Diagnostic Evaluation of Prostate Cancer.

Joan Alexander, Jude Kendall, Jean McIndoo, Linda Rodgers, Robert Aboukhalil, Dan Levy, Asya Stepansky, Guoli Sun, Lubomir Chobardjiev, Michael Riggs and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prostate zones and cancer: lost in transition?Nature reviews. Urology · 2022
    Review
  7. Accurate genomic variant detection in single cells with primary template-directed amplification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Single-Cell Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Joan AlexanderCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Jude KendallCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Jean McIndooCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Linda RodgersCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Robert AboukhalilCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Dan LevyCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Asya StepanskyCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Guoli SunCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Lubomir ChobardjievTechnological School of Electronic Systems, Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Michael RiggsCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Hilary CoxCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Inessa HakkerCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Dawid G NowakCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Juliana LazeDepartment of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Elton LlukaniDepartment of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abhishek SrivastavaDepartment of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Siobhan GruschowDepartment of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Shalini S YadavDepartment of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Brian RobinsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Gurinder AtwalCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Lloyd C TrotmanCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Herbert LeporDepartment of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
James HicksCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Michael WiglerCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Alexander KrasnitzCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. krasnitz@cshl.edu.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI LINGBO ZHANG · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
CSHL Watson School of Biological SciencesT32GM065094 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GANN, ALEXANDER · 2002 to 2021
$4.8M
Mechanisms and Treatment of PTEN Mutant Prostate TumorigenesisR01CA137050 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI TROTMAN, LLOYD C · 2010 to 2018
$3.1M
Computational Framework for Single-Cell Genomics of TumorsU01CA188590 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI KRASNITZ, ALEXANDER, WIGLER, MICHAEL H · 2015 to 2017
$934k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137050NCI NIH HHS U01 CA188590NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A distinction between indolent and aggressive disease is a major challenge in diagnostics of prostate cancer. As genetic heterogeneity and complexity may influence clinical outcome, we have initiated studies on single tumor cell genomics. In this study, we demonstrate that sparse DNA sequencing of single-cell nuclei from prostate core biopsies is a rich source of quantitative parameters for evaluating neoplastic growth and aggressiveness. These include the presence of clonal populations, the phylogenetic structure of those populations, the degree of the complexity of copy-number changes in those populations, and measures of the proportion of cells with clonal copy-number signatures. The parameters all showed good correlation to the measure of prostatic malignancy, the Gleason score, derived from individual prostate biopsy tissue cores. Remarkably, a more accurate histopathologic measure of malignancy, the surgical Gleason score, agrees better with these genomic parameters of diagnostic biopsy than it does with the diagnostic Gleason score and related measures of diagnostic histopathology. This is highly relevant because primary treatment decisions are dependent upon the biopsy and not the surgical specimen. Thus, single-cell analysis has the potential to augment traditional core histopathology, improving both the objectivity and accuracy of risk assessment and inform treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPhylogenyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentSingle-Cell AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29180472
PMCPMC5771881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.