Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29180377›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2017

Comparison of Canadian public medication insurance plans and the impact on out-of-pocket costs.

David J T Campbell, Braden J Manns, Lesley J J Soril, Fiona Clement

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring patient and pharmacist perspectives on complex interventions for cardiovascular prevention: A qualitative descriptive process evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  11. The human right to essential medicines applies to Canadians.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  18. The impact of pharmaceutical rebates on patients' drug expenditures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  19. Drug coverage in Canada: gaps and opportunities.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David J T CampbellAffiliations: Departments of Medicine (Campbell, Manns) and Community Health Sciences (Manns, Soril, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Manns, Clement), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Braden J MannsAffiliations: Departments of Medicine (Campbell, Manns) and Community Health Sciences (Manns, Soril, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Manns, Clement), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Lesley J J SorilAffiliations: Departments of Medicine (Campbell, Manns) and Community Health Sciences (Manns, Soril, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Manns, Clement), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Fiona ClementAffiliations: Departments of Medicine (Campbell, Manns) and Community Health Sciences (Manns, Soril, Clement) and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Manns, Clement), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch from 2006 documented substantial variation in medication coverage for residents across Canada. Since then, some provinces have implemented major medication plan reforms. We aimed to update the information on publicly funded medication insurance plans available across Canada and to compare out-of-pocket costs across the country.

methodsWe compared provincial medication insurance plans using data from public websites and other public source documents. Using 2 hypothetical clinical examples, we determined the amount and type of a patient's out-of-pocket costs for 5 different patient subtypes that varied based on medication burden, age and income.

resultsEach province offers a plan to all residents. Cost-sharing is employed across all provinces. Some residents must pay a premium to receive insurance or must pay 100% of their medication costs until they reach a deductible amount, above which government funding covers a portion of medication costs. With the scenario of low medication burden (medication cost about $500), out-of-pocket costs ranged from $250 to $2100 for higher-income residents and from $0 to $700 for lower-income residents. With the scenario of high medication burden (medication cost about $1800), the corresponding ranges were $250-$2500 and $0-$1100. The variation was due to province of residence, age and income.

interpretationVariations in out-of-pocket payments continue to exist across the provinces, with some groups facing high expenses. Further work is required to understand the impact of different cost-sharing mechanisms, develop policies to limit out-of-pocket expenses and improve provincial drug plans.

Identifiers

PMID29180377
PMCPMC5741433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.