ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2017
Analysis of ischemic muscle in patients with peripheral artery disease using X-ray spectroscopy.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A biomechanical perspective on walking in patients with peripheral artery disease.Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2023Review
- Elemental Composition of Skeletal Muscle Fibres Studied with Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Fluorescence (SR-XRF).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Diffusion tensor imaging indices of acute muscle damage are augmented after exercise in peripheral arterial disease.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Article
- Magnesium: Biochemistry, Nutrition, Detection, and Social Impact of Diseases Linked to Its Deficiency.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Synthesis and characterization of a hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with antioxidative and thermosensitive properties.RSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral artery disease (PAD) is a vascular disease caused by atherosclerosis, resulting in decreased blood flow to the lower extremities. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a standard PAD diagnostic test but only identifies reduced blood flow based on blood pressure differences. The early signs of PAD manifest themselves not only at a clinical level but also at an elemental and biochemical level. However, the biochemical and elemental alterations to PAD muscle are not well understood. The objective of this study was to compare fundamental changes in intracellular elemental compositions between control, claudicating, and critical limb ischemia muscle tissue. MATERIALS AND
methodsGastrocnemius biopsies from three subjects including one control (ABI ≥ 0.9), one claudicating (0.4 ≤ ABI < 0.9), and one critical limb ischemia patient (ABI < 0.4) were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to quantify differences in elemental compositions. Spectra were collected for five myofibers per specimen. An analysis of variance was performed to identify significant differences in muscle elemental compositions.
resultsThis study revealed that intracellular magnesium and calcium were lower in PAD compared with control myofibers, whereas sulfur was higher. Magnesium and calcium are antagonistic, meaning, if magnesium concentrations go down calcium concentrations should go up. However, our findings do not support this antagonism in PAD. Our analysis found decreases in sodium and potassium, in PAD myofibers.
conclusionsThese findings may provide insight into the pathologic mechanisms that may operate in ischemic muscle and aid in the development of specialized preventive and rehabilitative treatment plans for PAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.