Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29179946›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2018

Learning from regeneration research organisms: The circuitous road to scar free wound healing.

Jami R Erickson, Karen Echeverri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jami R EricksonDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Karen EcheverriDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. Electronic address: echev020@umn.edu.

Funding

Regulation of scar free wound healing in salamandersR01HD092451 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ECHEVERRI, KAREN · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin is the largest organ in the body and plays multiple essential roles ranging from regulating temperature, preventing infection and ultimately defining who we are physically. It is a highly dynamic organ that constantly replaces the outermost cells throughout life. However, when faced with a major injury, human skin cannot restore a significant lesion to its original functionality, instead a reparative scar is formed. In contrast to this, many other species have the unique ability to regenerate full thickness skin without formation of scar tissue. Here we review recent advances in the field that shed light on how the skin cells in regenerative species react to injury to prevent scar formation versus scar forming humans.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAmphibiansAnimalsCicatrixExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationHumansInvertebratesKeratinocytesMammalsPrenatal InjuriesRegenerationSkinSpecies SpecificityWound HealingCollagenRegenerationScarSkin

Identifiers

PMID29179946
PMCPMC5914521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.