Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29179918›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2018

When DNA Topology Turns Deadly - RNA Polymerases Dig in Their R-Loops to Stand Their Ground: New Positive and Negative (Super)Twists in the Replication-Transcription Conflict.

Andrei Kuzminov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Synthetic lethal mutants inJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrei KuzminovDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, B103 CLSL, 601 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801-3709, USA. Electronic address: kuzminov@life.illinois.edu.

Funding

Chromosomal death due to misincorporation of wrong material into DNAR01GM073115 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KUZMINOV, ANDREI · 2007 to 2022
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head-on replication-transcription conflict is especially bitter in bacterial chromosomes, explaining why actively transcribed genes are always co-oriented with replication. The mechanism of this conflict remains unclear, besides the anticipated accumulation of positive supercoils between head-on-conflicting polymerases. Unexpectedly, experiments in bacterial and human cells reveal that head-on replication-transcription conflict induces R-loops, indicating hypernegative supercoiling [(-)sc] in the region - precisely the opposite of that assumed. Further, as a result of these R-loops, both replication and transcription in the affected region permanently stall, so the failure of R-loop removal in RNase H-deficient bacteria becomes lethal. How hyper(-)sc emerges in the middle of a positively supercoiled chromosomal domain is a mystery that requires rethinking of topoisomerase action around polymerases.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationTranscription, GeneticBacillus subtilisChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRibonuclease HRNA, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRibonuclease HRNA, Bacterialreplication–transcription conflictsR-loopsRNase Hsupercoilingtopoisomerases

Identifiers

PMID29179918
PMCPMC5967978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.