Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29179716›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Patient perspectives on engagement in decision-making in early management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a qualitative study.

Todd Wilson, Jean Miller, Sylvia Teare, Colin Penman, Winnie Pearson, Nancy J Marlett, Svetlana Shklarov, P Diane Galbraith, Danielle A Southern, Merril L Knudtson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  7. Patient and Cardiologist Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Todd WilsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Jean MillerPatient and Community Engagement Research program, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Sylvia TearePatient and Community Engagement Research program, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Colin PenmanPatient and Community Engagement Research program, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Winnie PearsonPatient and Community Engagement Research program, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Nancy J MarlettDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Svetlana ShklarovDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
P Diane GalbraithDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Danielle A SouthernDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Merril L KnudtsonLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, GE64 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Colleen M NorrisFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 4-171 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, TCG 1C9, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Matthew T JamesDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Stephen B WiltonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. sbwilton@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurveys of patients suggest many want to be actively involved in treatment decisions for acute coronary syndromes. However, patient experiences of their engagement and participation in early phase decision-making have not been well described.

methodsWe performed a patient led qualitative study to explore patient experiences with decision-making processes when admitted to hospital with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Trained patient-researchers conducted the study via a three-phase approach using focus groups and semi-structured interviews and employing grounded theory methodology.

resultsTwenty patients discharged within one year of a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome participated in the study. Several common themes emerged. First, patients characterized the admission and early treatment of ACS as a rapidly unfolding process where they had little control. Participants felt they played a passive role in early phase decision-making. Furthermore, participants described feeling reduced capacity for decision-making owing to fear and mental stress from acute illness, and therefore most but not all participants were relieved that expert clinicians made decisions for them. Finally, once past the emergent phase of care, participants wanted to retake a more active role in their treatment and follow-up plans.

conclusionsPatients admitted with ACS often do not take an active role in initial clinical decisions, and are satisfied to allow the medical team to direct early phase care. These results provide important insight relevant to designing patient-centered interventions in ACS and other urgent care situations.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAcute coronary syndromeDecision aidGrounded theoryPatient engagementShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID29179716
PMCPMC5704522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.