Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29179710›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2017

Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis.

Sheila Payne, Rachael Eastham, Sean Hughes, Sandra Varey, Jeroen Hasselaar, Nancy Preston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Optimizing hospice care: A scoping review of staffing strategies to enhance practice.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheila PayneInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK. s.a.payne@lancaster.ac.uk.
Rachael EasthamDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Sean HughesInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Sandra VareyDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
Jeroen HasselaarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nancy PrestonInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 335555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective integration between hospices, palliative care services and other local health care services to support patients with palliative care needs is an important international priority. A previous model suggests that integration involves a cumulative stepped process of engagement with other organisations labelled as 'support, supplant or supplement', but the extent to which this model currently applies in the United Kingdom is unknown. We aimed to investigate accounts of hospice integration with local health care providers, using the framework provided by the model, to determine how service users and healthcare professionals perceived palliative care services and the extent of integration experienced.

methodsLongitudinal organisational case study methods were employed using qualitative serial interviews (interval 3 months) with patients and family carers focusing on how services responded to their needs; and group interviews with health professionals. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed by qualitative content analysis and combined across data sources.

resultsThe study focused on four hospices in northern England, including 34 patients (diagnosis: 17 cancer, 10 COPD, 7 heart failure), 65% female, mean age 66 (range 44-89), 13 family carers of these patients (48% partners), and 23 health care professionals. While some care fell short of expectations, all patients reported high levels of satisfaction and valued continuity of care and efficient information sharing. All hospices supported and supplemented local providers, with three hospices also supplanting local provision by providing in-patient facilities.

conclusionUK hospices predominantly operate in ways that support and supplement other providers. In addition, some also supplant local services, taking over direct responsibility and funding in-patient care. They all contributed to integration with local services, with greater blurring of boundaries than defined by the original model. Integrated care offers the necessary flexibility to respond to changes in patient needs, however, constraints from funding drivers and a lack of clear responsibilities in the UK can result in shortfalls in optimal service delivery. Integrating hospice care with local healthcare services can help to address demographic changes, predominantly more frail older people, and disease factors, including the needs of those with non-malignant conditions. This model, tested in the UK, could serve as an example for other countries.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEnglandFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHospicesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational Case StudiesPalliative CareQualitative ResearchAdvanced diseaseContinuity of careDelivery of health careEnd-of-life careHospiceIntegrated carePalliative carePhysician-patient relationsPrimary health careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29179710
PMCPMC5704425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.