Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29179517›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

A phase I trial of NK-92 cells for refractory hematological malignancies relapsing after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation shows safety and evidence of efficacy.

Brent A Williams, Arjun Datt Law, Bertrand Routy, Neal denHollander, Vikas Gupta, Xing-Hua Wang, Amélie Chaboureau, Sowmya Viswanathan, Armand Keating

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05933070 (A Phase I Open-Label Dose Escalation Study Of Intravenous INKmune In Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts), which is not on this map. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05933070 phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I Open-Label Dose Escalation Study Of Intravenous INKmune In Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts (MDS-EB-1/2 - MDS-CMML 1/2) Or Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInmune Bio, Inc.Ran2020 to 2024Enrolled2ConditionsCancer, MDS-EB, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Acute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsINKmune
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anti-BCMA CAR-NK Cells Reveal Enhanced Cytolytic and Secretory Responses Against Myeloma Cells.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A novel cultivation strategy to recover NK cell cytotoxicity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Natural killer cell-based immunotherapy for cancer.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Review

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brent A WilliamsCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arjun Datt LawCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bertrand RoutyCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Neal denHollanderDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vikas GuptaCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Xing-Hua WangCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amélie ChaboureauCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sowmya ViswanathanCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Armand KeatingCell Therapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutologous NK cell therapy can treat a variety of malignancies, but is limited by patient-specific variations in potency and cell number expansion. In contrast, allogeneic NK cell lines can overcome many of these limitations. Cells from the permanent NK-92 line are constitutively activated, lack inhibitory receptors and appear to be safe based on two prior phase I trials. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a single-center, non-randomized, non-blinded, open-label, Phase I dose-escalation trial of irradiated NK-92 cells in adults with refractory hematological malignancies who relapsed after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). The objectives were to determine safety, feasibility and evidence of activity. Patients were treated at one of three dose levels (1 × 10

resultsTwelve patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma who relapsed after AHCT for relapsed/refractory disease were enrolled in this trial. The treatment was well tolerated, with minor toxicities restricted to acute infusional events, including fever, chills, nausea and fatigue. Two patients achieved a complete response (Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma), two patients had minor responses and one had clinical improvement on the trial.

conclusionsIrradiated NK-92 cells can be administered at very high doses with minimal toxicity in patients with refractory blood cancers, who had relapsed after AHCT. We conclude that high dose NK-92 therapy is safe, shows some evidence of efficacy in patients with refractory blood cancers and warrants further clinical investigation.

Indexed as

clinical triallymphomamultiple myelomaNK-92NK cell

Identifiers

PMID29179517
PMCPMC5687687
OpenAlexW2735011415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.