SynthesisBMC medical education2017
Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-Directed Learning in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Relationship Between Inspirational Teaching and Self-Directed Learning in Health Professions Students-A Mixed-Method Study.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
- Self-directed learning readiness in preclinical medical education: Patterns, variation, and academic outcomes from a mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Assessment of Mental Health Nurses' Competences: A Scoping Review.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- A prospective cohort study of WeChat-based school-family-hospital collaboration on improving general surgical nursing interns' key abilities.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Readiness for self-directed learning among first-year medical and nursing students at the Arabian Gulf University in Bahrain.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Self-directed learning ability and online student engagement among nursing students: the mediating role of information literacy and the moderating role of self-control.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Perception of Pediatric Resident Physicians on Self-Directed Learning: A Multi-institutional Survey.Indian pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of first-year medical student perceptions in the development of self-directed learning skills in a single medical school course.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Readiness for self-directed learning among undergraduate medical students in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa during COVID-19, Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing self-directed learning readiness among Indian medical graduates: Implications for educators and policymakers.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Experience in developing and implementing the self-directed learning assessment tools among undergraduate medical students.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2024Article
- Effect of stress on study skills self-efficacy in Nursing students: the chain mediating role of general self-efficacy and self-directed learning.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Readiness Among Medical Students in Sharjah, the United Arab Emirates.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Developing a Tool for Assessing the Process of Seeking Health Information: Online Think-Aloud Method.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of artificial intelligence-assisted image diagnosis software based on volume data reconstruction technique in medical imaging practice teaching.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern healthcare institutions are continuously changing, and Self-Directed Learning (SDL) abilities are considered a prerequisite for both nursing students and nurses in order to be proactive about these demanding challenges. To date, no systematic reviews of existing instruments aimed at detecting and critically evaluating SDL abilities have been published. Therefore, the aims of this review are: 1) identify the instruments for assessment of SDL abilities among nursing students and nurses; 2) critically evaluate the methodological studies quality; and 3) compare the psychometric properties of the available instruments.
methodsA psychometric-systematic-review was performed. CDSR, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PROSPERO, SCOPUS databases were searched without restrictions in time and setting. All primary studies involving nursing students or nurses, written in English and aimed at validating SDL assessment tools, were included. Studies retrieved were evaluated according to the COnsensus-based-Standards for the selection of health Measurement-INstruments (COSMIN) panel. Study inclusion, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by researchers independently.
resultsEleven studies were included and four tools based on Knowles's theory have emerged: 1) the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale; 2) the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education; 3) the Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning, and 4) the Self-Directed Learning Instrument. A few psychometric properties have been considered in each study, from two to four out of the ten required. The quality of the methodologies used was in general, from fair to poor with the exception of one instrument (the Self-Directed-Learning-Instrument). The psychometric proprieties that emerged across the tools were good in general: the Cronbach α was from 0.73 to 0.91; structural validities have also reported good indexes both in the explorative and in the confirmative factor analyses.
conclusionsOn the basis of the findings, the Self-Directed-Learning-Instrument can be recommended for the assessment of SDL abilities among nursing students and nurses, given the excellent methodology quality adopted in estimating the psychometric properties. However, rigorous study designs aimed at estimating psychometric properties of tools in wide samples of nursing students and nurses across different stages of professional life, from undergraduate education to professional maturity, in different cultural, educational, and work settings, are strongly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.