Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29178900›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease.

Amy van der Heijden, Bob C Mulder, P Marijn Poortvliet, Arnold J H van Vliet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy van der HeijdenStrategic Communication Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706, KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands. amy.vanderheijden@wur.nl.
Bob C MulderStrategic Communication Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706, KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
P Marijn PoortvlietStrategic Communication Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706, KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Arnold J H van VlietEnvironmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708, PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforming a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the opportunity to remove the tick as soon as possible, thereby greatly reducing the chance of contracting Lyme disease. However, compliance to performing the tick check is low. In addition, most previous studies on determinants of preventive measures to avoid Lyme disease lack a clear definition and/or operationalization of the term "preventive measures". Those that do distinguish multiple behaviors including the tick check, fail to describe the systematic steps that should be followed in order to perform the tick check effectively. Hence, the purpose of this study was to identify determinants of systematically performing the tick check, based on social cognitive theory.

methodsA cross-sectional self-administered survey questionnaire was filled out online by 508 respondents (M

resultsThe full regression model explained 28% of the variance in doing the tick check. Results showed that performing the tick check was associated with proximal goal (β = .23, p < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = .22, p < 0.01), self-evaluative outcome expectations (β = .21, p < 0.01), descriptive norm (β = .16, p < 0.01), and experience (β = .13, p < 0.01).

conclusionsOur study is among the first to examine the determinants of systematic performance of the tick check, using an extended version of social cognitive theory to identify determinants. Based on the results, a number of practical recommendations can be made to promote the performance of the tick check.

Indexed as

Self-ExaminationAdultAgedAnimalsCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLyme DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPsychological TheorySelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTicksDeterminantsHealth behaviorLyme diseaseSocial cognitive theoryTick check

Identifiers

PMID29178900
PMCPMC5702127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.