Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29178811›Full record

ArticleNano letters2018

Cell-Extracellular Matrix Mechanobiology: Forceful Tools and Emerging Needs for Basic and Translational Research.

Andrew W Holle, Jennifer L Young, Krystyn J Van Vliet, Roger D Kamm, Dennis Discher, Paul Janmey, Joachim P Spatz, Taher Saif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Microengineered Gradient Hydrogels for Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Untangling the fusion of spatial omics and mechanobiology.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Shape, Strain, and Stability: Epithelia Under High Strain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Imaging-Guided Microscale Photothermal Stereolithography Bioprinting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Integrins as Key Mediators of Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew W HolleDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research , Jahnstraße 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jennifer L YoungDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research , Jahnstraße 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Krystyn J Van VlietBioSystems & Micromechanics IRG, Singapore-MIT Alliance in Research and Technology , Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-0560
Roger D KammBioSystems & Micromechanics IRG, Singapore-MIT Alliance in Research and Technology , Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-304X
Dennis Discher
Paul Janmey
Joachim P SpatzDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research , Jahnstraße 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-9807
Taher SaifDepartment of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 1206 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.

Funding

PSOC@Penn Education and OutreachU54CA193417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2020
$10.5M
Nanoscience of 'Self' - reductionist approaches to hCD47 inhibition of phagocytesR01HL124106 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2014 to 2022
$3.1M
Nuclear Mechanics varies with Tissue Mechanics & Regulates CytoskeletonR21HL128187 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2016
$426k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193417NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL124106NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL128187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular biophysical cues have a profound influence on a wide range of cell behaviors, including growth, motility, differentiation, apoptosis, gene expression, adhesion, and signal transduction. Cells not only respond to definitively mechanical cues from the extracellular matrix (ECM) but can also sometimes alter the mechanical properties of the matrix and hence influence subsequent matrix-based cues in both physiological and pathological processes. Interactions between cells and materials in vitro can modify cell phenotype and ECM structure, whether intentionally or inadvertently. Interactions between cell and matrix mechanics in vivo are of particular importance in a wide variety of disorders, including cancer, central nervous system injury, fibrotic diseases, and myocardial infarction. Both the in vitro and in vivo effects of this coupling between mechanics and biology hold important implications for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsBiophysicsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell ProliferationCentral Nervous SystemCytoskeletonExtracellular MatrixFocal AdhesionsHumansIntegrinsMyocardial InfarctionNeoplasmsTranslational Research, BiomedicalIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID29178811
PMCPMC5842374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.