Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29178309›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2017

Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement as Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement.

Javier Martínez-Moreno, Virginia Merino, Amparo Nácher, José Luis Rodrigo, Mónica Climente, Matilde Merino-Sanjuán

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Development of aAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Does antibiotic bone cement reduce infection rates in primary total knee arthroplasty?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  15. Effectiveness of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in total joint arthroplasty at a tertiary medical center: A retrospective cohort study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Javier Martínez-MorenoDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Molecular Recognition and Technological Development, Mixed Center Polytechnic University of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Virginia MerinoDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Molecular Recognition and Technological Development, Mixed Center Polytechnic University of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Amparo NácherDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Molecular Recognition and Technological Development, Mixed Center Polytechnic University of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
José Luis RodrigoTraumatology Service, University Hospital Doctor Peset of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Mónica ClimentePharmacy Service, University Hospital Doctor Peset of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Matilde Merino-SanjuánDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Molecular Recognition and Technological Development, Mixed Center Polytechnic University of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of its most serious complications associated with arthroplasty is the development of infections. Although its prevalence is only between 0.5% and 3%, in some cases it can lead to death. Therefore, an important challenge in joint surgery is the prevention of infections when an arthroplasty is performed. The use of antibiotic-loaded cements could be a suitable tool due to numerous advantages. The main advantage of the use of antibiotic loading into bone cement derives directly from antibiotic release in the effect site, allowing achievement of high concentrations at the site of action, and minimal or no systemic toxicity. This route of administration was first described by Buchholz and Engelbrecht. In the case of infection treatment, this is an established method and its good results have been confirmed. However, its role in infection prevention, and, therefore, the use of these systems in clinical practice, has proved controversial because of the uncertainty about the development of possible antibiotic resistance after prolonged exposure time, their effectiveness, the cost of the systems, toxicity and loosening of mechanical properties. This review discusses all these topics, focusing on effectiveness and safety, antibiotic decisions, cement type, mixing method, release kinetics and future perspectives. The final objective is to provide the orthopaedic surgeons the right information in their clinical practice based on current evidence.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, ReplacementBone CementsHumansJoint ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsAntibioticArthroplastyBioactivityBone cementElution kinetics

Identifiers

PMID29178309
PMCPMC6584364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.