Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177818›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2017

Treatment of Cerebellar Ataxia in the Context of Systemic Diseases.

Malcolm Proudfoot, Alastair Wilkins

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malcolm ProudfootInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Alastair WilkinsInstitute of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. alastair.wilkins@bristol.ac.uk.
Southmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to assess the evidence behind treatment regimens for cerebellar ataxias occurring in the context of systemic disease. We will address systemic conditions which are associated with specific involvement of the cerebellum (rather than widespread nervous system involvement) and those conditions for which some degree of evidence of treatment response exists. Recent findings We have divided systemic disorders affecting the cerebellum into systemic immunological disorders, endocrine and metabolic disorders and paraneoplastic. Recent studies have increased understanding of the range of cerebellar disorders associated with a systemic immunological condition. The identification of newer pathogenic antibodies has improved diagnosis in conditions which would have previously been labelled as idiopathic. However, their rarity and phenotypic variability makes defining optimal immunomodulatory treatment regimens challenging. There is some evidence for beneficial effects of immunomodulation, particularly in anti-GAD ataxia and Hashimoto's encephalopathy, although, at this time, specific treatment regimens cannot be defined. Immune-mediated paraneoplastic cerebellar disorders show response to therapy dependent, to some extent, on the underlying pathogenic antibody. Much is still to be understood concerning treatment regimens for the ataxic manifestations of metabolic disorders, notably alcohol-induced cerebellar injury, which are common and which are associated with significant disability. Summary Despite their rarity, cerebellar ataxias occurring in the context of systemic disease cause significant morbidity and better therapies are required to improve outcomes associated with these conditions.

Indexed as

AtaxiaCerebellumImmunological diseaseMetabolic complicationsParaneoplasticSystemic disease

Identifiers

PMID29177818
PMCPMC5701948
OpenAlexW2768170771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.