Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177600›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

Pagers, Smartphones, and HIPAA: Finding the Best Solution for Electronic Communication of Protected Health Information.

Robert E Freundlich, Katherine L Freundlich, Brian C Drolet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert E FreundlichDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Avenue South, MAB 422F, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. robfreundlich@gmail.com.
Katherine L FreundlichDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hospital Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Brian C DroletDepartments of Plastic Surgery and Biomedical Informatics, and the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic communication is a topic that applies broadly to the professional activities of every physician and the pager has been the gold standard of communication for decades. We believe that this is a dated technology that is holding clinicians back from better, more efficient alternatives, particularly smartphones. In this manuscript, we examine the paradoxical reliance on pagers in academic medicine, at a time when the use of smartphones and text messaging is the subject of intense scrutiny with respect to its standing under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We provide previously unreported data regarding the electronic communication practices of academic medical centers in the United States, which we obtained through a survey of Designated Institutional Officials. These data highlight both the controversy around text messaging and HIPAA and a puzzling widespread reliance on pagers as an alternative.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAttitude of Health PersonnelComputer SecurityConfidentialityHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansSmartphoneText MessagingUnited StatesCommunicationHIPAAPagersProtected health informationSmartphones

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.