Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177534›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2018

Structural variations in wheat HKT1;5 underpin differences in Na

Bo Xu, Shane Waters, Caitlin S Byrt, Darren Plett, Stephen D Tyerman, Mark Tester, Rana Munns, Maria Hrmova, Matthew Gilliham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Promise of Synthetic Biology for Redesigning Plant Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Salinity tolerance in wheat: rethinking the targets.Journal of experimental botany · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Salt stress proteins in plants: An overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. High affinity NaPlant direct · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms of Sodium Transport in Plants-Progresses and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo XuAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Shane WatersSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, and Waite Research Institute, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Caitlin S ByrtAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Darren PlettSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, and Waite Research Institute, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Stephen D TyermanAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Mark TesterDivision of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 4700, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Rana MunnsSchool of Agriculture and Environment, and ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009, Australia.
Maria HrmovaSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, and Waite Research Institute, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. maria.hrmova@adelaide.edu.au.
Matthew GillihamAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Waite Research Precinct, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. matthew.gilliham@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0666-3078
Australian Research Council · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SAThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

ARC Discorvery DP120100900ARC Future Fellowship FT130100709Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Australian Research Council CE1400008DECRA DE150100837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important trait associated with the salt tolerance of wheat is the exclusion of sodium ions (Na

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBinding SitesCation Transport ProteinsCloning, MolecularIon TransportKineticsModels, MolecularPlant ProteinsPlant ShootsProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein IsoformsProtein Structure, SecondaryCation Transport ProteinsHKT1 protein, plantPlant ProteinsProtein IsoformsRecombinant ProteinsSodiumSymportersBreadEinkornGatekeeper cellsHigh-affinity K+ transporterIon transportMutagenesisSalt exclusionSalt toleranceStructure–functionXenopusYeast

Identifiers

PMID29177534
PMCPMC11105589
OpenAlexW2768097856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.