Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177509›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2018

Repetitive behaviors in autism are linked to imbalance of corticostriatal connectivity: a functional connectivity MRI study.

Angela E Abbott, Annika C Linke, Aarti Nair, Afrooz Jahedi, Laura A Alba, Christopher L Keown, Inna Fishman, Ralph-Axel Müller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cortical thickness abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela E AbbottDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Annika C LinkeDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Aarti NairDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Afrooz JahediDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Laura A AlbaDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Christopher L KeownDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Inna FishmanDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
Ralph-Axel MüllerDepartment of Psychology, Brain Development Imaging Laboratories, San Diego State University.
San Diego State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Integrity and Dynamic Processing Efficiency of Networks in ASDR01MH101173 · NIMH · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUELLER, RALPH-AXEL · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
Linking Local Activity and Functional Connectivity in AutismR01MH081023 · NIMH · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUELLER, RALPH-AXEL · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Multimodal Imaging of Social Brain Networks in ASDK01MH097972 · NIMH · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FISHMAN, INNA · 2012 to 2015
$599k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH097972NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural underpinnings of repetitive behaviors (RBs) in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), ranging from cognitive to motor characteristics, remain unknown. We assessed RB symptomatology in 50 ASD and 52 typically developing (TD) children and adolescents (ages 8-17 years), examining intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) of corticostriatal circuitry, which is important for reward-based learning and integration of emotional, cognitive and motor processing, and considered impaired in ASDs. Connectivity analyses were performed for three functionally distinct striatal seeds (limbic, frontoparietal and motor). Functional connectivity with cortical regions of interest was assessed for corticostriatal circuit connectivity indices and ratios, testing the balance of connectivity between circuits. Results showed corticostriatal overconnectivity of limbic and frontoparietal seeds, but underconnectivity of motor seeds. Correlations with RBs were found for connectivity between the striatal motor seeds and cortical motor clusters from the whole-brain analysis, and for frontoparietal/limbic and motor/limbic connectivity ratios. Division of ASD participants into high (n = 17) and low RB subgroups (n = 19) showed reduced frontoparietal/limbic and motor/limbic circuit ratios for high RB compared to low RB and TD groups in the right hemisphere. Results suggest an association between RBs and an imbalance of corticostriatal iFC in ASD, being increased for limbic, but reduced for frontoparietal and motor circuits.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAutistic DisorderBrain MappingCerebral CortexChildCorpus StriatumFemaleFrontal LobeHumansLimbic SystemMaleMotor CortexNeural PathwaysParietal LobeStereotyped Behaviorautism spectrum disorderfunctional connectivityrepetitive behaviorstriatum

Identifiers

PMID29177509
PMCPMC5793718
OpenAlexW2769484043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.