Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177251›Full record

ArticleResearch in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- )2017

A concurrent subtractive assembly approach for identification of disease associated sub-metagenomes.

Wontack Han, Mingjie Wang, Yuzhen Ye

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- ), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Locality-Sensitive Hashing-Based k-Mer Clustering for Identification of Differential Microbial Markers Related to Host Phenotype.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IdentifyingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wontack HanIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Mingjie WangIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Yuzhen YeIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Graph-centric approaches to metatranscriptomic and metaproteomic data analysisR01AI108888 · NIAID · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI YE, YUZHEN · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative analysis of metagenomes can be used to detect sub-metagenomes (species or gene sets) that are associated with specific phenotypes (e.g., host status). The typical workflow is to assemble and annotate metagenomic datasets individually or as a whole, followed by statistical tests to identify differentially abundant species/genes. We previously developed subtractive assembly (SA), a

Indexed as

comparative metagenomicsconcurrent subtractive assemblymetagenomeWilcoxon rank-sum test

Identifiers

PMID29177251
PMCPMC5697791
OpenAlexW2605715746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.