Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177248›Full record

Article... IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications2017

Detection of Norepinephrine in Whole Blood via Fast Scan Cyclic Voltammetry.

Evan N Nicolai, James K Trevathan, Erika K Ross, J Luis Lujan, Charles D Blaha, Kevin E Bennet, Kendall H Lee, Kip A Ludwig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ... IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan N NicolaiNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
James K TrevathanNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
Erika K RossNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
J Luis LujanNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
Charles D BlahaNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
Kevin E BennetNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
Kendall H LeeNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
Kip A LudwigNeurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Neurochemical closed-loop controller for smart DBSR01NS084975 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LUJAN, LUIS · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioelectronic Medicines is an emerging field that capitalizes on minimally-invasive technology to stimulate the autonomic nervous system in order to evoke therapeutic biomolecular changes at the end-organ. The goal of Bioelectronic Medicines is to realize both 'precision and personalized' medicine. 'Precise' stimulation of neural circuitry creates biomolecular changes targeted exactly where needed to maximize therapeutic effects while minimizing off-target changes associated with side-effects. The therapy is then 'personalized' by utilizing implanted sensors to measure the biomolecular concentrations at, or near, the end-organ of interest and continually adjusting therapy to account for patient-specific biological changes throughout the day. To realize the promise of Bioelectronic Medicines, there is a need for minimally invasive, real-time measurement of biomarkers associated with the effects of autonomic nerve stimulation to be used for continuous titration of therapy. In this study we examine the feasibility of using fast scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) to measure norepinephrine levels, a neurochemical relevant to end-organ function, directly from blood. FSCV is a well-understood method for measuring electroactive neurochemicals in the central nervous system with high temporal and high spatial resolution that has yet to be adapted to the study of the autonomic nervous system. The results demonstrate that while detecting the electroactive neurochemical norepinephrine in blood is more challenging than obtaining the same FSCV measurements in a buffer solution due to biofouling of the electrode, it is feasible to utilize a minimally invasive FSCV electrode to obtain neurochemical measurements in blood.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systembioelectronics medicinesbloodfast scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV)minimally invasivenorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID29177248
PMCPMC5698011
OpenAlexW2736425100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.