Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177171›Full record

ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2017

Grafting with Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane versus Conservative Wound Care in Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mehdi Dehghani, Negar Azarpira, Vahid Mohammad Karimi, Hamid Mossayebi, Elaheh Esfandiari

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Efficacy of Stem Cells in Wound Healing: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehdi DehghaniHematology & Oncology Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Negar AzarpiraTransplant Research Center, Shiraz Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Vahid Mohammad KarimiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hamid MossayebiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Elaheh EsfandiariTransplant Research Center, Shiraz Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the healing process of pressure ulcers treated with cryopreserved human amniotic membrane allograft and routine pressure ulcer care in our hospital.

methodsFrom January 2012 to December 2013, in a prospective randomized clinical trial (IRCT201612041335N2), 24 patients with second and third stage of pressure ulcers were enrolled in this study. All patients needed split-thickness skin grafts for pressure ulcer-wound coverage. Selected patients had symmetric ulcers on both upper and lower extremities. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: amnion and control. In the amnion group, the ulcer was covered with cryopreserved amniotic membrane and in the control group it was treated with local Dilantin powder application. The duration and success rate of complete healing was compared between the two groups.

resultsThe study group was composed of 24 pressure ulcers in 24 patients (19 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 44±12.70 years. The demographic characteristics, ulcer area, and underlying diseases were similar in both groups. The early sign of response, such as decrease in wound discharge, was detected 12-14 days after biological dressing. Complete pressure ulcer healing occurred only in the amnion group (

conclusionCryopreserved amniotic membrane is an effective biologic dressing that promotes re-epithelialization in pressure ulcers.

Indexed as

Amniotic membraneDressingGraftingPressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID29177171
PMCPMC5694597
OpenAlexW2760377997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.