Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177167›Full record

ArticleVisceral medicine2017

Impact of Body Mass Index on Early Postoperative and Long-Term Outcome after Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Björn Gebauer, Frank Meyer, Henry Ptok, Ralf Steinert, Ronny Otto, Hans Lippert, Ingo Gastinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visceral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Björn GebauerInstitute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Frank MeyerInstitute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Henry PtokInstitute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ralf SteinertDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, St Joseph Hospital, Salzkotten, Germany.
Ronny OttoInstitute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Hans LippertInstitute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ingo GastingerInstitute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DESt. Joseph-Krankenhaus · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity and underweight onto early postoperative and long-term oncological outcome after surgery for rectal cancer.

methodsData from 2008 until 2011 was gathered by a German prospective multicenter observational study. 62 items were reported by the physicians in charge, and a consecutive follow-up was performed if the patient had signed a consent form. Patients were subclassified into: underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese - using the definitions of the World Health Organization.

resultsIn total, 9,920 patients were included, of whom 2.1% were underweight and 19.4% obese. The mean age was 68 years (range 21-99 years). Postoperative morbidity (mean 38.0%) was significantly increased in underweight and obese patients (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 3.1% on average with no significant differences among patient groups (p = 0.176). The 5-year overall survival ranged between 36.9 and 61.3% and was worse in underweight and prolonged in overweight and obese patients compared to those with normal weight (p < 0.001 each). While the 5-year disease-free survival was increased in overweight and obese patients (p < 0.05 each), the 5-year local recurrence rate showed no correlation (p > 0.05 each). Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age, higher ASA scoring, postoperative morbidity, and advanced tumor growth worsened the long-term survival independently.

conclusionsUnderweight patients had a worse early and long-term outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Overweight and obesity were associated with a significantly better long-term survival.

Indexed as

Body mass index, BMIProspective multicenter observational studyRectal cancerResearch on clinical care

Identifiers

PMID29177167
PMCPMC5697505
OpenAlexW2763444498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.