Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29177008›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2017

Deciphering cyanobacterial phenotypes for fast photoautotrophic growth via isotopically nonstationary metabolic flux analysis.

Mary H Abernathy, Jingjie Yu, Fangfang Ma, Michelle Liberton, Justin Ungerer, Whitney D Hollinshead, Saratram Gopalakrishnan, Lian He, Costas D Maranas, Himadri B Pakrasi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Improving productivity of citramalate from COBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bio-protocol · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cyanobacterial Bioenergetics in Relation to Cellular Growth and Productivity.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Tuning a high performing multiplexed-CRISPRiMetabolic engineering communications · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toward bioproduction of oxo chemicals from CBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mary H AbernathyDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Jingjie YuDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA.
Fangfang MaDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132 USA.
Michelle LibertonDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Justin UngererDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Whitney D HollinsheadDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Saratram GopalakrishnanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
Lian HeDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Costas D MaranasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
Himadri B PakrasiDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Doug K AllenDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-8946
Yinjie J TangDepartment of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-0649
Washington University in St. Louis · USPennsylvania State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USDonald Danforth Plant Science Center · USTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsThe

conclusionsThis study employed flux analysis to investigate phenotypic heterogeneity among two cyanobacterial strains with near-identical genome background. The flux/metabolite profiling, biomass composition analysis, and genetic modification results elucidate a highly effective metabolic topology for CO

Indexed as

13C labeling experimentsChannelingEnergy chargeGlycogenMetabolitesPhotobioreactor

Identifiers

PMID29177008
PMCPMC5691832
OpenAlexW2771018545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.