Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29176991›Full record

ReviewAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2017

Asthma biomarkers in the age of biologics.

Harold Kim, Anne K Ellis, David Fischer, Mary Noseworthy, Ron Olivenstein, Kenneth R Chapman, Jason Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The epithelial era of asthma research: knowledge gaps and future direction for patient care.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Emerging Therapies in the Medical Management of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  13. Effects of Family-Supported Healthcare on Children with Asthma.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diagnostic value of IL-6 for patients with asthma: a meta-analysis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Just as the Twig Is Bent, the Tree's Inclined.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Harold KimDivision of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, Department of Medicine, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 5C1 Canada.
Anne K EllisDivision of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, 15 Arch Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada.
David FischerDivision of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, Department of Medicine, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 5C1 Canada.
Mary NoseworthyAlberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.
Ron OlivensteinDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3605 Rue De la Montagne, Montreal, QC H3G 2M1 Canada.
Kenneth R ChapmanAsthma and Airway Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8 Canada.
Jason LeeToronto Allergy and Asthma Centre, 123 Edward St, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada.
Western University · CAAlberta Children's Hospital · CAMcGill University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heterogeneous nature of asthma has been understood for decades, but the precise categorization of asthma has taken on new clinical importance in the era of specific biologic therapy. The simple categories of allergic and non-allergic asthma have given way to more precise phenotypes that hint at underlying biologic mechanisms of variable airflow limitation and airways inflammation. Understanding these mechanisms is of particular importance for the approximately 10% of patients with severe asthma. Biomarkers that aid in phenotyping allow physicians to "personalize" treatment with targeted biologic agents. Unfortunately, testing for these biomarkers is not routine in patients whose asthma is refractory to standard therapy. Scientific advances in the recognition of sensitive and specific biomarkers are steadily outpacing the clinical availability of reliable and non-invasive assessment methods designed for the prompt and specific diagnosis, classification, treatment, and monitoring of severe asthma patients. This article provides a practical overview of current biomarkers and testing methods for prompt, effective management of patients with severe asthma that is refractory to standard therapy.

Indexed as

AsthmaBiologicsBiomarkersPhenotypes

Identifiers

PMID29176991
PMCPMC5691861
OpenAlexW2767743996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.