ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017
Deployment of Mobile EEG Technology in an Art Museum Setting: Evaluation of Signal Quality and Usability.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of EEG, fMRI, and fNIRS Studies on the Psychological Impact of Nature on Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting State Anxiety Level Change Using EEG Parameters: A Pilot Study in Two Museum Settings.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Validation of Neuphony 8-channel EEG flex cap: a comparative study with BioSemi 64-channel EEG system.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Ecological decoding of visual aesthetic preference with oscillatory electroencephalogram features-A mini-review.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2024Review
- Neuroergonomics on the Go: An Evaluation of the Potential of Mobile EEG for Workplace Assessment and Design.Human factors · 2023Article
- Tour guide robot: a 5G-enabled robot museum guide.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
- Developments in scalable strategies for detecting early markers of cognitive decline.Translational psychiatry · 2022Review
- More Than Meets the Eye: Art Engages the Social Brain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Objective assessment of impulse control disorder in patients with Parkinson's disease using a low-cost LEGO-like EEG headset: a feasibility study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world environments.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- HyPyP: a Hyperscanning Python Pipeline for inter-brain connectivity analysis.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Quantifying Signal Quality From Unimodal and Multimodal Sources: Application to EEG With Ocular and Motion Artifacts.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Design and Characterization of an EEG-Hat for Reliable EEG Measurements.Micromachines · 2020Article
- EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Comparison between a wireless dry electrode EEG system with a conventional wired wet electrode EEG system for clinical applications.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Are the new mobile wireless EEG headsets reliable for the evaluation of musical pleasure?PloS one · 2020Article
- Dynamic Changes in EEG Power Spectral Densities During NIH-Toolbox Flanker, Dimensional Change Card Sort Test and Episodic Memory Tests in Young Adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Cost-efficient and Custom Electrode-holder Assembly Infrastructure for EEG Recordings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a powerful tool for quantitatively studying the brain that enables natural and mobile experiments. Recent advances in EEG have allowed for the use of dry electrodes that do not require a conductive medium between the recording electrode and the scalp. The overall goal of this research was to gain an understanding of the overall usability and signal quality of dry EEG headsets compared to traditional gel-based systems in an unconstrained environment. EEG was used to collect Mobile Brain-body Imaging (MoBI) data from 432 people as they experienced an art exhibit in a public museum. The subjects were instrumented with either one of four dry electrode EEG systems or a conventional gel electrode EEG system. Each of the systems was evaluated based on the signal quality and usability in a real-world setting. First, we describe the various artifacts that were characteristic of each of the systems. Second, we report on each system's usability and their limitations in a mobile setting. Third, to evaluate signal quality for task discrimination and characterization, we employed a data driven clustering approach on the data from 134 of the 432 subjects (those with reliable location tracking information and usable EEG data) to evaluate the power spectral density (PSD) content of the EEG recordings. The experiment consisted of a baseline condition in which the subjects sat quietly facing a white wall for 1 min. Subsequently, the participants were encouraged to explore the exhibit for as long as they wished (piece-viewing). No constraints were placed upon the individual in relation to action, time, or navigation of the exhibit. In this freely-behaving approach, the EEG systems varied in their capacity to record characteristic modulations in the EEG data, with the gel-based system more clearly capturing stereotypical alpha and beta-band modulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.