Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29176939›Full record

ArticleAddiction research & theory2016

Views of Experienced Electronic Cigarette Users.

Raman Baweja, Katherine M Curci, Jessica Yingst, Susan Veldheer, Shari Hrabovsky, Stephen J Wilson, Travis T Nichols, Thomas Eissenberg, Jonathan Foulds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction research & theory, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measurement of Electronic Cigarette Frequency of Use Among Smokers Participating in a Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. General and Device-Specific Reasons for ENDS Use: A Qualitative Study with Adult ENDS Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Validation of an E-cigarette Purchase Task in Advanced Generation Device Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and nicotine on emissions and dynamics of electronic cigarette aerosols.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2020
    Article
  18. Experiences of women with cervical dysplasia and associated diagnoses using electronic cigarettes for smoking substitution.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raman BawejaDepartment of Psychiatry, Penn State University College of Medicine, 500 University Dr. Hershey PA 17033 USA.
Katherine M CurciDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jessica YingstTobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Susan VeldheerTobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Shari HrabovskyTobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Stephen J WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
Travis T NicholsDepartment of Psychology, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
Thomas EissenbergCenter for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Jonathan FouldsTobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Research Training and Educational Component (Component I) p370-385P50DA036107 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI FOULDS, JONATHAN, MUSCAT, JOSHUA E · 2013 to 2018
$19.5M
Training and Education Core p270-287P50DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2013 to 2017
$19.2M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036105NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the last five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users.

method1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data was analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

resultsParticipants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapor to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session.

conclusionsExperienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.

Indexed as

DependenceElectronic cigaretteExperiencePublic HealthSmokingSurvey

Identifiers

PMID29176939
PMCPMC5699475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.