Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29176867›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Application of non-Gaussian water diffusional kurtosis imaging in the assessment of uterine tumors: A preliminary study.

Aliou Amadou Dia, Masatoshi Hori, Hiromitsu Onishi, Makoto Sakane, Takashi Ota, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Tomoyuki Okuaki, Noriyuki Tomiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aliou Amadou DiaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Masatoshi HoriDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2523-3789
Hiromitsu OnishiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Makoto SakaneDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takashi OtaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takahiro TsuboyamaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Mitsuaki TatsumiDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Tomoyuki OkuakiPhilips Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the interobserver reliability and value of diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the assessment of uterine tumors compared with those of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

methodsThis retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, which waived the requirement for informed consent. Fifty-eight women (mean age: 55.0 ± 13.6 years; range: 30-89 years) with suspected malignant uterine tumors underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging using DKI and DWI. Twelve had coexisting leiomyoma. Two observers analyzed region-of-interest measurements of diffusivity (D), kurtosis (K), and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of uterine lesions and healthy adjacent tissues. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The mean values were compared using one-way analysis of variance with a post-hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The diagnostic accuracy of D and ADC in differentiating malignant tumors from benign leiomyomas was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsThe ICCs between the two observers in evaluating D, K, and the ADC of the malignant tumors were higher than 0.84, suggesting excellent interobserver agreements. The mean D (×10-3 mm2/s) of uterine cancers (1.05 ± 0.41 and 1.09 ± 0.40 for observers 1 and 2, respectively) were significantly lower than those of leiomyoma (1.40 ± 0.37 and 1.56 ± 0.33, respectively; P < 0.05), healthy myometrium (1.72 ± 0.27 and 1.69 ± 0.30, respectively; P < 0.001), and healthy endometrium (1.53 ± 0.35 and 1.42 ± 0.37, respectively; P < 0.005). There was no significant difference in the area under the ROC curve between D and ADC. The mean K of uterine cancers (0.88 ± 0.28 and 0.90 ± 0.23, respectively) were higher than those of myometrium (0.72 ± 0.10 and 0.73 ± 0.10, respectively; P < 0.001), healthy endometrium (0.65 ± 0.13 and 0.60 ± 0.18, respectively; P < 0.001), and leiomyoma (0.76 ± 0.14 and 0.77 ± 0.16, respectively; not significant, P > 0.1).

conclusionsInterobserver agreements in evaluating D, K, and ADC were moderate to excellent. D performed equally to conventional DWI in differentiating between benign and malignant uterine lesions. The mean K of malignant uterine lesions was significantly higher than that of non-tumorous myometrium or endometrium.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell DifferentiationDiagnostic ImagingDiffusionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveUterine NeoplasmsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID29176867
PMCPMC5703480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.