ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017
Pre-clinical antigenicity studies of an innovative multivalent vaccine for human visceral leishmaniasis.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human sand fly challenge elicits saliva-specific innate and type 1-polarized immunity that promotes Leishmania killing.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic potential of GLP recombinant antigens in whole blood assays for Leishmania infantum infection.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Human sand fly challenge elicits saliva-specific innate and TbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Applications of virus-like particles in the prevention of protozoan parasite infection.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Application of the Sponge Model Implants in the Study of Vaccine Memory in Mice Previously Immunized with LBSap.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Vaccine efficacy induced by virus-like particles containing Leishmania donovani surface glycoprotein GP63.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Review
- Tick saliva and its role in pathogen transmission.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
- Article
- Leishmania Vaccines: the Current Situation with Its Promising Aspect for the Future.The Korean journal of parasitology · 2022Article
- An overview of the sand fly salivary proteins in vaccine development against leishmaniases.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2022Review
- Review
- Sand flies: Basic information on the vectors of leishmaniasis and their interactions with Leishmania parasites.Communications biology · 2022Review
- Humoral Responses and Ex Vivo IFN-γ Production after Canine Whole Blood Stimulation withVeterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Some Good and Some Bad: Sand Fly Salivary Proteins in the Control of Leishmaniasis and in Autoimmunity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Nano- and Microformulations to Advance Therapies for Visceral Leishmaniasis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The notion that previous infection by Leishmania spp. in endemic areas leads to robust anti-Leishmania immunity, supports vaccination as a potentially effective approach to prevent disease development. Nevertheless, to date there is no vaccine available for human leishmaniasis. We optimized and assessed in vivo the safety and immunogenicity of an innovative vaccine candidate against human visceral leishmaniasis (VL), consisting of Virus-Like Particles (VLP) loaded with three different recombinant proteins (LJL143 from Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva as the vector-derived (VD) component, and KMP11 and LeishF3+, as parasite-derived (PD) antigens) and adjuvanted with GLA-SE, a TLR4 agonist. No apparent adverse reactions were observed during the experimental time-frame, which together with the normal hematological parameters detected seems to point to the safety of the formulation. Furthermore, measurements of antigen-specific cellular and humoral responses, generally higher in immunized versus control groups, confirmed the immunogenicity of the vaccine formulation. Interestingly, the immune responses against the VD protein were reproducibly more robust than those elicited against leishmanial antigens, and were apparently not caused by immunodominance of the VD antigen. Remarkably, priming with the VD protein alone and boosting with the complete vaccine candidate contributed towards an increase of the immune responses to the PD antigens, assessed in the form of increased ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation against both the PD antigens and total Leishmania antigen (TLA). Overall, our immunogenicity data indicate that this innovative vaccine formulation represents a promising anti-Leishmania vaccine whose efficacy deserves to be tested in the context of the "natural infection".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.