Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29176824›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Safety and efficacy of a freeze-dried trivalent antivenom for snakebites in the Brazilian Amazon: An open randomized controlled phase IIb clinical trial.

Iran Mendonça-da-Silva, Antônio Magela Tavares, Jacqueline Sachett, José Felipe Sardinha, Lilian Zaparolli, Maria Fátima Gomes Santos, Marcus Lacerda, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Snakebite Envenomations In The Brazilian Amazon: A Little Less Neglected.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iran Mendonça-da-SilvaEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Antônio Magela TavaresDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Jacqueline SachettEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
José Felipe SardinhaDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Lilian ZaparolliInstituto de Biologia do Exército, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Fátima Gomes SantosLaboratório Químico e Farmacêutico do Exército, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcus LacerdaEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Wuelton Marcelo MonteiroEscola Superior de Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-1940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn tropical areas, a major concern regarding snakebites treatment effectiveness relates to the failure in liquid antivenom (AV) distribution due to the lack of an adequate cold chain in remote areas. To minimize this problem, freeze-drying has been suggested to improve AV stability. METHODS AND

findingsThis study compares the safety and efficacy of a freeze-dried trivalent antivenom (FDTAV) and the standard liquid AV provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (SLAV) to treat Bothrops, Lachesis and Crotalus snakebites. This was a prospective, randomized, open, phase IIb trial, carried out from June 2005 to May 2008 in the Brazilian Amazon. Primary efficacy endpoints were the suppression of clinical manifestations and return of hemostasis and renal function markers to normal ranges within the first 24 hours of follow-up. Primary safety endpoint was the presence of early adverse reactions (EAR) in the first 24 hours after treatment. FDTAV thermal stability was determined by estimating AV potency over one year at 56°C. Of the patients recruited, 65 and 51 were assigned to FDTAV and SLAV groups, respectively. Only mild EARs were reported, and they were not different between groups. There were no differences in fibrinogen (p = 0.911) and clotting time (p = 0.982) recovery between FDTAV and SLAV treated groups for Bothrops snakebites. For Lachesis and Crotalus snakebites, coagulation parameters and creatine phosphokinase presented normal values 24 hours after AV therapy for both antivenoms. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Since promising results were observed for efficacy, safety and thermal stability, our results indicate that FDTAV is suitable for a larger phase III trial.

trial registrationISRCTNregistry: ISRCTN12845255; DOI: 10.1186/ISRCTN12845255 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12845255).

Indexed as

BothropsCrotalusAdolescentAdultAnimalsAntiveninsBlood CoagulationBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFibrinogenFreeze DryingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAntiveninsFibrinogen

Identifiers

PMID29176824
PMCPMC5720814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.