Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29176789›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Promising new vaccine candidates against Campylobacter in broilers.

Marine Meunier, Muriel Guyard-Nicodème, Estelle Vigouroux, Typhaine Poezevara, Véronique Beven, S Quesne, Lionel Bigault, Michel Amelot, Daniel Dory, Marianne Chemaly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preharvest Control ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Therapeutic and protective approaches to combatFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Consortium ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Two Recombinant Protein-Based Vaccine Regimens againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of biodiversity betweenEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Systematic Review ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Novel ClinicalMicroorganisms · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marine MeunierHQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Muriel Guyard-NicodèmeHQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Estelle VigourouxGVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Typhaine PoezevaraHQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Véronique BevenGVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
S QuesneHQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Lionel BigaultGVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Michel AmelotSELEAC-Avian Breeding and Experiment Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Daniel DoryGVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Marianne ChemalyHQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8432-3223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is the leading cause of human bacterial gastroenteritis in the European Union. Birds represent the main reservoir of the bacteria, and human campylobacteriosis mainly occurs after consuming and/or handling poultry meat. Reducing avian intestinal Campylobacter loads should impact the incidence of human diseases. At the primary production level, several measures have been identified to reach this goal, including vaccination of poultry. Despite many studies, however, no efficient vaccine is currently available. We have recently identified new vaccine candidates using the reverse vaccinology strategy. This study assessed the in vivo immune and protective potential of six newly-identified vaccine antigens. Among the candidates tested on Ross broiler chickens, four (YP_001000437.1, YP_001000562.1, YP_999817.1, and YP_999838.1) significantly reduced cecal Campylobacter loads by between 2 and 4.2 log10 CFU/g, with the concomitant development of a specific humoral immune response. In a second trial, cecal load reductions results were not statistically confirmed despite the induction of a strong immune response. These vaccine candidates need to be further investigated since they present promising features.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesCampylobacterChickensEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunoglobulinsBacterial VaccinesIgYImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID29176789
PMCPMC5703506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.