ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017
Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy Combined with Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram with the peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio before treatment predicts the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Extracranial vertebral artery to middle cerebral artery bypass in therapeutic internal carotid artery occlusion for epipharyngeal carcinoma: A technical case report.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- ATF5 involved in radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotype transition.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Article
- Development and validation of immune inflammation-based index for predicting the clinical outcome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Expression of miR-34a and Ki67 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- DW-MRI-Guided Dose Escalation Improves Local Control of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy (CT) combined with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 329 NPC patients without any previous treatment were included in this study between January 2009 and November 2013. These patients were divided into three groups: CT group (n=114), SRT group (n=109), and CT + SRT group (n=106). Contrast-enhanced nasopharyngeal computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance (MR) scan was performed on the third month after treatment. Short-term efficacy was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Toxicity was graded according to the Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria (RTOG) and the World Health Organization (WHO) toxicity grading scale. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and incidence rate of acute toxicity (grade ≥3) were calculated after a 24 month follow-up. RESULTS Total response rate of all patients was 85.41%. Compared with the CT group and the SRT group, the CT + SRT group showed a substantially improved efficacy in NPC treatment. The incidence rate of the acute toxicity in the CT + SRT group was slightly higher than in the CT group and the SRT group, but the difference was not statistically significant. No treatment-related deaths were observed. The CT + SRT group had the highest two-year OS and PFS, followed by the CT group and the SRT group. CONCLUSIONS It was shown that NPC patients treated with CT + SRT had better short- and long-term efficacy than those treated with CT or SRT alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.