Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29176360›Full record

ArticleJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2018

Intergenerational Consequences: Women's Experiences of Discrimination in Pregnancy Predict Infant Social-Emotional Development at 6 Months and 1 Year.

Lisa Rosenthal, Valerie A Earnshaw, Joan M Moore, Darrah N Ferguson, Tené T Lewis, Allecia E Reid, Jessica B Lewis, Emily C Stasko, Jonathan N Tobin, Jeannette R Ickovics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experiences with discrimination during pregnancy in Canada and associations with depression and anxiety symptoms.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa RosenthalPsychology Department, Pace University, New York, NY.
Valerie A EarnshawDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Joan M MoorePsychology Department, Pace University, New York, NY.
Darrah N FergusonPsychology Department, Pace University, New York, NY.
Tené T LewisDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Allecia E ReidDepartment of Psychology Colby College, Waterville, ME.
Jessica B LewisYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Emily C StaskoDepartment of Psychology Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Jonathan N TobinClinical Directors Network, New York, NY.
Jeannette R IckovicsYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Funding

Integrating Prenatal Care to Reduce HIV/STDs Among Teens: A Translational StudyR01MH074399 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ICKOVICS, JEANNETTE R · 2006 to 2010
$5.1M
Integrating Prenatal Care to Reduce HIV/STDs Among Teens: A Translational StudyR01MH074394 · NIMH · CLINICAL DIRECTORS NETWORK, INC. · PI TOBIN, JONATHAN N. · 2006 to 2010
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074394NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRacial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in infant development in the United States have lifelong consequences. Discrimination predicts poorer health and academic outcomes. This study explored for the first time intergenerational consequences of women's experiences of discrimination reported during pregnancy for their infants' social-emotional development in the first year of life.

methodsData come from a longitudinal study with predominantly Black and Latina, socioeconomically disadvantaged, urban young women (N = 704, Mage = 18.53) across pregnancy through 1 year postpartum. Women were recruited from community hospitals and health centers in a Northeastern US city. Linear regression analyses examined whether women's experiences of everyday discrimination reported during pregnancy predicted social-emotional development outcomes among their infants at 6 months and 1 year of age, controlling for potentially confounding medical and sociodemographic factors. Path analyses tested if pregnancy distress, anxiety, or depressive symptoms mediated significant associations.

resultsEveryday discrimination reported during pregnancy prospectively predicted greater inhibition/separation problems and greater negative emotionality, but did not predict attention skills or positive emotionality, at 6 months and 1 year. Depressive symptoms mediated the association of discrimination with negative emotionality at 6 months, and pregnancy distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms mediated the association of discrimination with negative emotionality at 1 year.

conclusionFindings support that there are intergenerational consequences of discrimination, extending past findings to infant social-emotional development outcomes in the first year of life. It may be important to address discrimination before and during pregnancy and enhance support to mothers and infants exposed to discrimination to promote health equity across the life span.

Indexed as

AnxietyChild DevelopmentDepressionSocial DiscriminationStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID29176360
PMCPMC5866165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.