Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29175813›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2017

Demands and Needs for Psycho-Oncological eHealth Interventions in Women With Cancer: Cross-Sectional Study.

Johanna Ringwald, Lennart Marwedel, Florian Junne, Katrin Ziser, Norbert Schäffeler, Lena Gerstner, Markus Wallwiener, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Martin Hautzinger, Stephan Zipfel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Johanna RingwaldDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-4720
Lennart MarwedelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9826-4762
Florian JunneDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3925-6949
Katrin ZiserDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-4082
Norbert SchäffelerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-921X
Lena GerstnerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-6404
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-9340
Sara Yvonne BruckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-1094
Martin HautzingerDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6082-2602
Stephan ZipfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-4440
Martin TeufelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2120-1840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade, a growing body of studies regarding the application of eHealth and various digital interventions has been published and are widely used in the psycho-oncological care. However, the effectiveness of eHealth applications in psycho-oncological care is still questioned due to missing considerations regarding evidence-based studies on the demands and needs in cancer-affected patients.

objectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to explore the cancer-affected women's needs and wishes for psycho-oncological content topics in eHealth applications and whether women with cancer differ in their content topics and eHealth preferences regarding their experienced psychological burden.

methodsPatients were recruited via an electronic online survey through social media, special patient Internet platforms, and patient networks (both inpatients and outpatients, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany). Participant demographics, preferences for eHealth and psycho-oncological content topics, and their experienced psychological burden of distress, quality of life, and need for psychosocial support were evaluated.

resultsOf the 1172 patients who responded, 716 were included in the study. The highest preference for psycho-oncological content topics reached anxiety, ability to cope, quality of life, depressive feelings, and adjustment toward a new life situation. eHealth applications such as Web-based applications, websites, blogs, info email, and consultation hotline were considered to be suitable to convey these content topics. Psychological burden did not influence the preference rates according to psycho-oncological content and eHealth applications.

conclusionsPsycho-oncological eHealth applications may be very beneficial for women with cancer, especially when they address psycho-oncological content topics like anxiety, ability to cope, depressive feelings, self-esteem, or adjustment to a new life situation. The findings of this study indicate that psycho-oncological eHealth applications are a promising medium to improve the psychosocial care and enhance individual disease management and engagement among women with cancer.

Indexed as

cancer, oncology, eHealthInternetneedsWeb-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID29175813
PMCPMC5722981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.